Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to count all 2017 VAT in regional funding

Committee step 4 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 11 October 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill to correct the effect of the implementation of the Immediate Information System (SII) in the management of VAT.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000285· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill explains that the new SII system delayed the deadline for filing VAT returns, so only eleven months of revenue were recorded in 2017, with an effect of 4,150 million euros.
  2. The bill would add a new provision to Law 22/2009 with rules for the 2017 final settlement: all VAT paid by taxpayers in 2017 would count as that year's revenue, even if it was recorded in the 2018 budget.
  3. According to the bill, these rules would not change Law 22/2009, only clarify it, because that law already refers to cash-basis revenue and state revenue in the fiscal year.
  4. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette, except for measures affecting the current budget, which would wait until the next budget year.

Who it affects

  • Autonomous communities under the common regime: They would avoid a cut in their final 2017 funding system resources.
  • Companies using the SII system: Their 2017 VAT payments would count for the settlement even if recorded in 2018.
  • The Ministry of Finance: It would have to follow these criteria when calculating the final 2017 settlement.

Words worth knowing

SII (Sistema de Información Inmediata)
A system through which companies report the invoices they issue and receive to the Tax Agency, for VAT purposes.
Liquidación definitiva
Final calculation of the resources each autonomous community receives under the funding system.
Criterio de caja
Cash basis: counting revenue when it is actually received, not when it is recorded in the books.
ITE
An index calculated from state VAT revenue that determines how several regional funding funds evolve.
Sujeto pasivo
Person or company required to pay VAT to the Tax Agency.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced11 October 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted16 October 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments21 December 2018Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee20 February 2019A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
Oct 2018Nov 2018Dec 2018Jan 2019Feb 201911. 11 October 2018: Presentación22. 16 October 2018: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 16/10/2018 hasta 19/10/201833. 16 October 2018: Calificación44. 19 October 2018: Gobierno Contestación desde 19/10/2018 hasta 27/11/201855. 27 November 2018: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 27/11/2018 hasta 11/12/201866. 11 December 2018: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 11/12/2018 hasta 18/12/201877. 18 December 2018: Comisión de Hacienda y Administraciones Públicas Publicación desde 18/12/2018 hasta 21/12/201888. 21 December 2018: Comisión de Hacienda Enmiendas desde 21/12/2018 hasta 20/02/201999. 20 February 2019: Comisión de Hacienda Informe desde 20/02/2019 hasta 05/03/20191010. 5 March 2019: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 05/03/2019 hasta 27/03/2019

11 December 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 171 yes · 89 no · 81 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, to correct the effect of the implementation of the Immediate Information System (SII) in the management of VAT.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 162· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista and Vasco (EAJ-PNV). 10 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 38 most voted in favour; in 1, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 38
  • Against: 1
  • Abstained: 4
  • Tie: 9
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
84 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 against · 1 abst.
Mixto19
10 in favour · 1 against · 7 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
31 in favour · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
1 in favour · 65 abst. · 1 did not vote
GER9
8 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso134
129 in favour · 5 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.