What it is
Proposal to count all 2017 VAT in regional funding
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 11 October 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill to correct the effect of the implementation of the Immediate Information System (SII) in the management of VAT.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000285· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill explains that the new SII system delayed the deadline for filing VAT returns, so only eleven months of revenue were recorded in 2017, with an effect of 4,150 million euros.
- The bill would add a new provision to Law 22/2009 with rules for the 2017 final settlement: all VAT paid by taxpayers in 2017 would count as that year's revenue, even if it was recorded in the 2018 budget.
- According to the bill, these rules would not change Law 22/2009, only clarify it, because that law already refers to cash-basis revenue and state revenue in the fiscal year.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette, except for measures affecting the current budget, which would wait until the next budget year.
Who it affects
- Autonomous communities under the common regime: They would avoid a cut in their final 2017 funding system resources.
- Companies using the SII system: Their 2017 VAT payments would count for the settlement even if recorded in 2018.
- The Ministry of Finance: It would have to follow these criteria when calculating the final 2017 settlement.
Words worth knowing
- SII (Sistema de Información Inmediata)
- A system through which companies report the invoices they issue and receive to the Tax Agency, for VAT purposes.
- Liquidación definitiva
- Final calculation of the resources each autonomous community receives under the funding system.
- Criterio de caja
- Cash basis: counting revenue when it is actually received, not when it is recorded in the books.
- ITE
- An index calculated from state VAT revenue that determines how several regional funding funds evolve.
- Sujeto pasivo
- Person or company required to pay VAT to the Tax Agency.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced11 October 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted16 October 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments21 December 2018Groups propose changes.
- Committee20 February 2019A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
11 December 2018
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, to correct the effect of the implementation of the Immediate Information System (SII) in the management of VAT.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 162· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Albacete Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 2 no · 3 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 12 yes · 5 no · 12 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 4 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 4 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Huesca Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Jaén Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- La Rioja More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- León More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Lugo More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 7 no · 8 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla Tie 4 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 3 no · 5 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista and Vasco (EAJ-PNV). 10 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 38 most voted in favour; in 1, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 38
- Against: 1
- Abstained: 4
- Tie: 9
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 84 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 against · 1 abst. |
| Mixto | 19 | 10 in favour · 1 against · 7 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 31 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 1 in favour · 65 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 8 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 129 in favour · 5 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000285
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 162
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.