Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill proposes a runoff system for Spanish municipal elections

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 31 July 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's Organic bill amending Organic Law 5/1985, of 19 June, on the General Electoral Regime, for the modification of the provisions relating to municipal elections.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000267· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would add a runoff system to municipal elections. If a candidacy wins an absolute majority Half of all the members of the chamber plus one: 176 of 350 in the Congreso. of the vote, it wins outright and council seats are allocated under current rules.
  2. A candidacy would automatically get a majority of council seats (half plus one) if it wins over 35% of the vote and leads the next candidacy by five points, or if it wins over 30% and leads by ten points.
  3. If no candidacy meets those thresholds, a second round would be held. Only candidacies that got at least 15% of valid votes in the first round could take part.
  4. After the runoff, the leading candidacy would get half plus one of the council seats if it wins over 40% of the vote or leads the runner-up by at least 7 points. Otherwise, seats would be allocated based on first-round results.
  5. The majority bonus would only apply to parties that ran alone or on a joint list presented before the vote. The goal is to prevent later deals that push aside the most voted option.
  6. The Government would have one month from the law's entry into force to approve the rules needed to run the second round.

Who it affects

  • City councils and local entities: The way council seats are allocated and mayors are chosen would change, with a possible second round.
  • Political parties: Candidacies would need at least 15% of votes to enter the runoff and 5% to be counted at all.
  • Voters in municipal elections: They could vote in a second round if no candidacy reaches the required results in the first one.

Words worth knowing

LOREG
Ley Orgánica del Régimen Electoral General, the Spanish law that regulates elections.
Segunda vuelta (second round)
A new vote held when the first round does not produce a final result.
Barrera electoral (electoral threshold)
Minimum share of votes a candidacy needs to take part or win council seats.
Prima de mayoría (majority bonus)
Extra council seats given to the most voted list to make it easier for it to govern.
absolute majority
Half of all the members of the chamber plus one: 176 of 350 in the Congreso.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced31 July 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted4 September 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Jul 2018Aug 2018Sept 201811. 31 July 2018: Presentación22. 4 September 2018: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 04/09/2018 hasta 07/09/201833. 4 September 2018: Calificación44. 7 September 2018: Gobierno Contestación desde 07/09/2018 hasta 09/10/201855. 9 October 2018: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 09/10/2018 hasta 16/10/201866. 16 October 2018: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 16/10/2018 hasta 22/10/2018

16 October 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 138 yes · 179 no · 30 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 5/1985, of 19 June, on the General Electoral Regime, to modify the provisions relating to municipal elections.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 148· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 15 most voted in favour; in 20, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 15
  • Against: 20
  • Tie: 17
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
84 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Mixto19
3 in favour · 14 against · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
1 in favour · 30 abst. · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
67 against
GER9
9 against
Popular en el Congreso134
134 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.