What it is
Proposal to require more checks before power plants can close
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 27 April 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill to amend Law 24/2013, of 26 December, on the electricity sector, regarding the authorization procedure for the closure of electricity generation facilities.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000238· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would amend the Electricity Sector Act so that closing power plants would not depend only on the owner, but would also protect supply, prices, competition and environmental goals.
- The bill would require temporary or permanent closures of peninsular plants over 50 MW to first get opinions from the National Markets and Competition Commission, the Climate Change Office and the Institute for Energy Diversification and Saving, issued within three months. If any of them finds a significant negative impact, the closure would be denied.
- If a closure is denied for reasons other than supply risk, measures could be approved to keep the plant running, including a competitive process in which another company takes over the facility. These rules would also apply to nuclear plants.
- For nuclear plants, notifying the intent to stop operating or missing the deadline to request a license renewal would count as a closure request. Failing to request the renewal on time would become a punishable offense.
Who it affects
- Companies owning power plants over 50 MW: They would need prior opinions and could see their closures denied.
- Nuclear plant owners: Special rules would apply: announcing a shutdown or not requesting renewal would count as a closure request, and missing the renewal deadline would be an offense.
- Electricity consumers: The goal would be to protect supply, prices and competition in the electricity market.
- Public bodies (National Markets and Competition Commission, Climate Change Office, Institute for Energy Diversification and Saving): They would have to issue reasoned opinions within three months.
Words worth knowing
- Dictamen
- An official opinion or report issued by a public body on a specific matter.
- Silencio administrativo
- What is considered decided when the administration does not answer in time. Here, no answer would mean denial.
- Concurrencia competitiva
- A process where several companies compete, in this case to take over the plant.
- Proposición de ley
- A bill introduced by members of Congress. While it is being processed, it is not in force.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced27 April 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted3 May 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
11 September 2018
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, to amend Law 24/2013, of 26 December, on the electricity sector, regarding the authorization procedure for the closure of electricity generation facilities.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 138· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Almería Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Ávila Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 4 yes · 17 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 6 no
- Cantabria More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- León More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Lleida Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes against 15 yes · 21 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 7 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia Tie 5 yes · 5 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos and Gcup-ec-em. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 13 most voted in favour; in 26, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 13
- Against: 26
- Tie: 13
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 84 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Mixto | 19 | 3 in favour · 7 against · 1 abst. · 8 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 31 against · 1 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 1 in favour · 62 against · 4 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 9 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 133 in favour · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000238
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 138
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.