Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to improve unemployment benefits in Spain

Amendments step 3 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 22 March 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.

Official title: Private member's bill on unemployment protection.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000215· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would reverse cuts to unemployment benefits and return to the situation before the 2012 reforms, which lowered payment amounts and tightened access requirements.
  2. It would lower the minimum contribution period to receive unemployment benefits to 180 days for people under 30, instead of the current 365 days, with a four-month duration.
  3. It would restore the 70% rate applied to the calculation base for the entire duration of the benefit, instead of the 50% rate after day 181 set by the 2012 reform.
  4. The means-tested allowance would rise to 100% of the IPREM Indicador público de rentas de efectos múltiples: a public income reference used in Spain to calculate benefits and income limits. (or 127% with family dependents), the early retirement allowance would return to age 52, and the proportional reduction for part-time work would be removed.
  5. It would extend unemployment protection to domestic workers, removing their current exclusion from the system.
  6. The Government would have to review active employment policies, moving money from company incentives toward training, counseling, and a special program for young people without professional qualifications.

Who it affects

  • Unemployed people receiving or eligible for benefits: Changes would affect the amount, duration, and access requirements for benefits and allowances.
  • Young people under 30: They would need fewer contributions to qualify for benefits and would get a special employment program if unqualified.
  • Domestic workers: They could access unemployment protection for the first time.
  • Unemployed workers over 52: They would regain the early retirement allowance with better amount and duration conditions.
  • Part-time and discontinuous permanent workers: Their unemployment protection would be equal to that of full-time workers.

Words worth knowing

Prestación contributiva (unemployment benefit)
Money paid by the State to someone who lost their job and contributed enough beforehand through social security payments.
Subsidio asistencial (means-tested allowance)
Financial aid for unemployed people who exhausted regular benefits or do not meet the requirements, at a lower amount.
IPREM
Indicador público de rentas de efectos múltiples: a public income reference used in Spain to calculate benefits and income limits.
Base reguladora (calculation base)
Reference amount, calculated from social security contributions, used to set how much a benefit pays.
Fijo discontinuo (discontinuous permanent worker)
Worker with a permanent contract who only works during certain periods of the year, depending on the company's activity.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced22 March 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted2 April 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments12 June 2018Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2018Jun 2018Sept 2018Dec 201811. 22 March 2018: Presentación22. 2 April 2018: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 02/04/2018 hasta 06/04/201833. 2 April 2018: Calificación44. 6 April 2018: Gobierno Contestación desde 06/04/2018 hasta 16/05/201855. 16 May 2018: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 16/05/2018 hasta 29/05/201866. 29 May 2018: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 29/05/2018 hasta 07/06/201877. 7 June 2018: Comisión de Empleo y Seguridad Social Publicación desde 07/06/2018 hasta 12/06/201888. 12 June 2018: Comisión de Empleo y Seguridad Social Enmiendas desde 12/06/2018 hasta 26/06/201899. 26 June 2018: Comisión de Trabajo, Migraciones y Seguridad Social Enmiendas desde 26/06/2018 hasta 05/03/20191010. 5 March 2019: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 05/03/2019 hasta 27/03/2019

29 May 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 169 yes · 132 no · 39 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill from the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea, on unemployment protection.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 119· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 20 most voted in favour; in 16, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 20
  • Against: 16
  • Tie: 16
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
82 in favour · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 abst.
Mixto19
14 in favour · 1 against · 2 abst. · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
32 abst.
Gcup-ec-em67
65 in favour · 2 did not vote
GER9
8 in favour · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso134
131 against · 3 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.