Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to end temporary contracts and make permanent hiring the rule

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 27 February 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.

Official title: Private member's bill for the fight against labor precariousness.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000194· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill, introduced by the Ciudadanos parliamentary group and admitted for processing in Congress, is not an approved law: it is an initial text that is still going through the legislative process.
  2. The bill would make all employment contracts permanent by default. Fixed-term contracts would only be allowed for substitutions (leave, vacations, vacancies pending coverage) and for training contracts.
  3. Dismissal grounds and current severance pay would stay in place: 20 days of wages per year of service for objective and collective dismissals, and 33 days per year for unfair dismissals. A new ground would be added: the justified elimination of an individual job position.
  4. The bill would create a system of personal Social Security accounts, inspired by the so-called Austrian backpack: companies would contribute to each worker's account, and those rights could be used in case of unemployment (even if the worker quits), retirement, disability or death, and would carry over between jobs.
  5. Temporary staffing agencies could only supply workers for substitution and training cases, and would be jointly liable for contracts that break the law. In addition, violations involving fraudulent contracts and breaches of working time rules would move from serious to very serious offenses, counted as one offense per affected worker.
  6. The Government would have to strengthen public employment services and the Labor Inspectorate, with a shock plan, data analysis tools and extraordinary inspection plans, and adapt within one year the rules on public employment, health care and science to permanent hiring.

Who it affects

  • Temporary workers: Their contracts would become permanent except for substitutions and training, and they would gain protection: 15 days' notice and 20 days' pay per year when the contract ends.
  • Companies: They could no longer use project-based or seasonal contracts; they would have to justify any dismissal and contribute to their workers' personal accounts.
  • Temporary staffing agencies: Their activity would be limited to substitution and training cases, and they would be liable along with the client company if there is fraud.
  • Public administrations and health and research staff: The Government would have to adapt their rules to also make permanent hiring the norm there.
  • Unemployed people: Public employment services would be strengthened, with personalized guidance, training vouchers and statistical profiling to help them find work.

Words worth knowing

Despido objetivo (objective dismissal)
Dismissal for economic, technical, organizational or production reasons, not for the worker's conduct.
Mochila austriaca (Austrian backpack)
A system where workers accumulate rights in a personal account they can use if they become unemployed, even if they quit voluntarily.
Contrato de puesta a disposición (supply contract)
A contract between a temporary staffing agency and a client company to supply a worker.
Infracción muy grave (very serious offense)
A type of violation carrying the highest penalties provided by law.
Amortización de un puesto de trabajo (job position elimination)
Removing a job position because the company no longer needs it on a permanent basis.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced27 February 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted6 March 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Feb 2018Mar 2018Apr 2018May 201811. 27 February 2018: Presentación22. 6 March 2018: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 06/03/2018 hasta 09/03/201833. 6 March 2018: Calificación44. 9 March 2018: Gobierno Contestación desde 09/03/2018 hasta 18/04/201855. 18 April 2018: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 18/04/2018 hasta 19/06/201866. 19 June 2018: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 19/06/2018 hasta 25/06/2018

19 June 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 33 yes · 302 no · 8 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, on the fight against labor precariousness.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 124· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Ciudadanos. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-em, GER, Sin grupo and Popular en el Congreso. 10 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 52, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 52
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista82
82 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Mixto19
2 in favour · 9 against · 8 abst.
Ciudadanos32
31 in favour · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
67 against
GER9
9 against
Sin grupo1
1 against
Popular en el Congreso134
129 against · 5 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.