What it is
Bill to end temporary contracts and make permanent hiring the rule
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 27 February 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.
Official title: Private member's bill for the fight against labor precariousness.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000194· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill, introduced by the Ciudadanos parliamentary group and admitted for processing in Congress, is not an approved law: it is an initial text that is still going through the legislative process.
- The bill would make all employment contracts permanent by default. Fixed-term contracts would only be allowed for substitutions (leave, vacations, vacancies pending coverage) and for training contracts.
- Dismissal grounds and current severance pay would stay in place: 20 days of wages per year of service for objective and collective dismissals, and 33 days per year for unfair dismissals. A new ground would be added: the justified elimination of an individual job position.
- The bill would create a system of personal Social Security accounts, inspired by the so-called Austrian backpack: companies would contribute to each worker's account, and those rights could be used in case of unemployment (even if the worker quits), retirement, disability or death, and would carry over between jobs.
- Temporary staffing agencies could only supply workers for substitution and training cases, and would be jointly liable for contracts that break the law. In addition, violations involving fraudulent contracts and breaches of working time rules would move from serious to very serious offenses, counted as one offense per affected worker.
- The Government would have to strengthen public employment services and the Labor Inspectorate, with a shock plan, data analysis tools and extraordinary inspection plans, and adapt within one year the rules on public employment, health care and science to permanent hiring.
Who it affects
- Temporary workers: Their contracts would become permanent except for substitutions and training, and they would gain protection: 15 days' notice and 20 days' pay per year when the contract ends.
- Companies: They could no longer use project-based or seasonal contracts; they would have to justify any dismissal and contribute to their workers' personal accounts.
- Temporary staffing agencies: Their activity would be limited to substitution and training cases, and they would be liable along with the client company if there is fraud.
- Public administrations and health and research staff: The Government would have to adapt their rules to also make permanent hiring the norm there.
- Unemployed people: Public employment services would be strengthened, with personalized guidance, training vouchers and statistical profiling to help them find work.
Words worth knowing
- Despido objetivo (objective dismissal)
- Dismissal for economic, technical, organizational or production reasons, not for the worker's conduct.
- Mochila austriaca (Austrian backpack)
- A system where workers accumulate rights in a personal account they can use if they become unemployed, even if they quit voluntarily.
- Contrato de puesta a disposición (supply contract)
- A contract between a temporary staffing agency and a client company to supply a worker.
- Infracción muy grave (very serious offense)
- A type of violation carrying the highest penalties provided by law.
- Amortización de un puesto de trabajo (job position elimination)
- Removing a job position because the company no longer needs it on a permanent basis.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced27 February 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted6 March 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
19 June 2018
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, on the fight against labor precariousness.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 124· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 2 yes · 10 no
- Almería More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Barcelona More votes against 3 yes · 23 no · 4 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cádiz More votes against 1 yes · 8 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Córdoba More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Granada More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- León More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 6 yes · 29 no
- Málaga More votes against 2 yes · 9 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 1 yes · 10 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 2 yes · 14 no
- Valladolid More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 6 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Ciudadanos. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-em, GER, Sin grupo and Popular en el Congreso. 10 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 52, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 0
- Against: 52
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 82 | 82 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Mixto | 19 | 2 in favour · 9 against · 8 abst. |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 31 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 67 against |
| GER | 9 | 9 against |
| Sin grupo | 1 | 1 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 129 against · 5 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000194
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 124
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.