What it is
Proposal to expand the Civil Guard's additional staffing
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 7 December 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill amending Act 29/2014, of 28 November, on the Personnel Regime of the Civil Guard.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000155· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would amend Article 25 of the Civil Guard Personnel Law. The idea is that Civil Guard members assigned outside the Corps would no longer hold a spot on the staffing roster, so others could be promoted and fill that spot.
- Today that solution only exists for the rank of General. The reform would extend it to all ranks: anyone moving to work in other ministries, the Royal Household, or international organizations would count as additional staffing and free up their position.
- The Government would have two months to review the Royal Decree setting the Civil Guard staffing for 2017-2021 and adapt it to the new rule.
- The rule would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Civil Guard members: Other Civil Guard members could be promoted when a colleague moves to work at another organization, because the position would become vacant.
- The Civil Guard as an institution: It would recover personnel without increasing spending: positions held by those working elsewhere could be filled again.
- The Government: It would have to review the staffing Royal Decree within two months to adapt it to the reform.
Words worth knowing
- Plantilla adicional (additional staffing)
- Positions held by Civil Guard members assigned outside the Corps. They do not count toward the regular roster, so their position can be filled by someone else.
- Plantilla reglamentaria (regulatory staffing roster)
- The maximum number of members the Civil Guard can have, set by the Government based on the money allocated in the State General Budgets.
- Amortizar una vacante (abolish a vacancy)
- To eliminate a position that becomes vacant instead of filling it with someone new.
- Proposición de ley (non-governmental bill)
- A draft law introduced by parliamentary groups in the Congress of Deputies. It is not a law until Parliament passes it.
- Oferta de Empleo Público (public employment offer)
- The positions the Administration opens through civil service exams each year to hire staff.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced7 December 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted12 December 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Was there a plenary vote?
We have no plenary vote linked to this law in the Congreso’s data.
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000155
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.