Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would allow hunting and fishing of invasive alien species

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 20 October 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill to amend Law 42/2007, of 13 December, on Natural Heritage and Biodiversity.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000137· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would allow hunting and fishing, in all modalities, of invasive alien species already present in the natural environment before 2007, but only within the areas they occupied back then. Outside those areas, their use would be banned, to discourage illegal releases.
  2. It creates a new category, the naturalized species: an exotic species legally introduced before Law 42/2007, with no significant effects on the natural environment and with social or economic interest. the State Commission could approve a list of these species and suspend their cataloging or promote their removal from the catalog in exceptional cases of public interest.
  3. The autonomous communities could allow releases of rainbow trout in waters where they were already done before 2007, but only with captive-bred, sterile specimens unable to reproduce, to ease fishing pressure on the common trout.
  4. The use of exotic species in aquaculture, including those listed as invasive, would be governed by Council Regulation 708/2007. New definitions are also added, such as zoogenetic resources, naturalized species and release.
  5. Unauthorized import of non-native species and unauthorized release into the natural environment of native or non-native species, or of domestic animals, would become offenses, and the criteria for classifying them as very serious, serious or minor would be adjusted.
  6. The strategies for controlling or eradicating species in the catalog must be approved and published within five years, with government resources co-funded through the Fund for Natural Heritage and Biodiversity. In the meantime, the autonomous communities could authorize hunting and fishing of these species in delimited zones.

Who it affects

  • Hunters and sport fishers: They could hunt and fish invasive species within the areas they occupied before 2007, but not outside them.
  • Autonomous communities: They gain a framework to delimit areas, authorize rainbow trout releases and manage these species in their territory.
  • Rural municipalities and the tourism sector: The aim is to recover the hunting and fishing activities that bring economy and jobs to their areas.
  • Aquaculture companies and businesses using listed species: Their activity would be governed by Regulation 708/2007, giving legal certainty to their regime.
  • Any person or organization: They could request the inclusion or exclusion of a species in the catalog, with a scientific argument.

Words worth knowing

Especie exótica invasora (invasive alien species)
A species introduced by humans outside its natural range that threatens the native species, habitats or ecosystems of the area.
Especie alóctona (non-native species)
A species that is not native to the place where it is found.
Catalogación (cataloging)
Including a species in the Spanish Catalog of Invasive Alien Species, which brings prohibitions such as owning it or trading it.
Acuicultura (aquaculture)
The farming of aquatic animals and plants, such as fish, for consumption or other uses.
Recursos zoogenéticos (zoogenetic resources)
Animal species used or that can be used to produce food, agriculture or livestock.

It summarizes the text passed by the Senado. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced20 October 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted24 October 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments17 November 2017Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee7 March 2018A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate16 April 2018The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE28 June 2018It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 13 official steps on a timeline
Oct 2017Nov 2017Dec 2017Jan 2018Feb 2018Mar 2018Apr 2018May 201811. 20 October 2017: Presentación22. 24 October 2017: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 24/10/2017 hasta 27/10/201733. 24 October 2017: Calificación44. 27 October 2017: Gobierno Contestación desde 27/10/2017 hasta 27/10/201755. 27 October 2017: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 27/10/2017 hasta 07/11/201766. 7 November 2017: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 07/11/2017 hasta 14/11/201777. 14 November 2017: Comisión de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente Publicación desde 14/11/2017 hasta 17/11/201788. 17 November 2017: Comisión de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente Enmiendas desde 17/11/2017 hasta 07/03/201899. 7 March 2018: Comisión de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente Informe desde 07/03/2018 hasta 05/04/20181010. 5 April 2018: Comisión de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente Aprobación con competencia legislativa plena desde 05/04/2018 hasta 16/04/20181111. 16 April 2018: Senado desde 16/04/2018 hasta 19/06/20181212. 19 June 2018: Pleno Enmiendas o veto del Senado desde 19/06/2018 hasta 28/06/20181313. 28 June 2018: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 28/06/2018 hasta 04/09/2018

28 June 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 179 yes · 164 no

Voted on: Remaining amendments.

This law had 3 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 48 of sitting 128· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 8 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 23 most voted in favour; in 12, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 23
  • Against: 12
  • Tie: 17
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista83
82 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 against
Mixto19
12 in favour · 7 against
Ciudadanos32
30 in favour · 2 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
65 against · 2 did not vote
GER9
9 against
Popular en el Congreso134
133 in favour · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.