What it is
Bill proposes an independent agency to oversee Spanish education
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 18 October 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.
Official title: Private member's bill for the creation of an Independent Agency to assume the functions of the High Educational Inspection, the High Educational Inspection Agency.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000135· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill, introduced by Ciudadanos in October 2017 and not yet passed, proposes creating the Independent Agency for State Higher Educational Inspection, a body that would ensure compliance with state education laws.
- The Agency would act with full independence from the Government and public administrations, although it would be attached to the Ministry of Education and subject to parliamentary and judicial oversight.
- Its duties would include checking compliance with the requirements of the education system, curricula, degrees and scholarships, and safeguarding equal access to education for all Spaniards. It would also serve as an advisory body.
- It could request information from administrations, inspect schools, issue binding circulars, and even challenge before the courts any acts that violate state education laws.
- It would be led by a Director together with a Council of four members, all appointed by the Government from a shortlist of three drawn up by a technical selection committee, with six-year terms and no renewal.
- An additional provision would task the Agency with guaranteeing the ideological neutrality of public schools, protecting whistleblowers, and referring suspected crimes to the State Attorney General's Office.
Words worth knowing
- Alta Inspección Educativa (Higher Educational Inspection)
- A state function that monitors whether the autonomous communities comply with the state's basic rules on education.
- Autoridad administrativa independiente (independent administrative authority)
- A public body that acts without taking instructions from the Government, even though it is attached to a ministry.
- Terna
- A shortlist of three candidates from which only one may be chosen.
- Indemnidad (whistleblower protection)
- Guaranteed protection for whistleblowers so that no one can harm them for reporting wrongdoing.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced18 October 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted24 October 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
23 November 2017
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, for the creation of an Independent Agency to assume the functions of the High Educational Inspection, the High Educational Inspection Agency.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 89· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 18 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 13 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 7 yes · 3 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes against 4 yes · 5 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 24 most voted in favour; in 16, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 24
- Against: 16
- Tie: 12
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 78 against · 6 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Mixto | 19 | 2 in favour · 15 against · 2 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 32 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 61 against · 6 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 8 against · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 127 in favour · 7 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000135
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 89
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.