Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would reform Spain's judiciary law: leave, vacations and Council elections

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 6 October 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000133· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would restore rights cut during the economic crisis for judges, prosecutors and court staff: extra vacation days for seniority and the eighteen days of personal leave. It would also set paternity leave at four weeks.
  2. It would change how the twelve judicial members of the General Council of the Judiciary are chosen: active judges and magistrates would elect them directly by personal, secret ballot, instead of parliamentary groups.
  3. It would add limits and controls for Council members: a maximum of two consecutive terms, full-time dedication, asset declarations, and public hearings for candidates before appointment.
  4. It would regulate court president positions with five-year terms renewable only once, and require holders of those posts to declare their assets and financial holdings.
  5. It would improve court staffing: create a Human Resources Commission to coordinate the central government and the autonomous communities, regulate temporary civil servants, and reserve thirty percent of public job openings for internal promotion.
  6. It would push digital justice: courts and prosecutors' offices would have to use electronic means, a single online notice board would be created, and the record of judgments would be generated automatically by computer systems.

Who it affects

  • Judges and magistrates: They would recover vacation and leave rights and directly elect the Council's judicial members.
  • Prosecutors, court clerks and court staff: They would recover pre-crisis leave and see new rules on access, internal promotion and pay.
  • General Council of the Judiciary (Consejo General del Poder Judicial): Its composition, term limits and internal workings would change.
  • People who go to court: They would deal with the courts through electronic means when procedural rules require it.

Words worth knowing

Consejo General del Poder Judicial
The body that governs judges in Spain, for example by appointing them to posts.
Vocal
Each of the twenty members of the General Council of the Judiciary.
Orden jurisdiccional
Each branch of the courts: civil, criminal, administrative and labor.
Edictos
Public notices issued by courts, for example to summon someone to a trial.
Promoción interna
A system letting a civil servant move up to a higher corps through a competition, without an open exam.

It summarizes the text passed by the Senado. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced6 October 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted10 October 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments10 November 2017Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee28 February 2018A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary24 October 2018All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate30 October 2018The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE20 December 2018It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 14 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2017Mar 2018Jun 2018Sept 201811. 6 October 2017: Presentación22. 10 October 2017: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 10/10/2017 hasta 13/10/201733. 10 October 2017: Calificación44. 13 October 2017: Gobierno Contestación desde 13/10/2017 hasta 16/10/201755. 16 October 2017: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 16/10/2017 hasta 24/10/201766. 24 October 2017: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 24/10/2017 hasta 06/11/201777. 6 November 2017: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 06/11/2017 hasta 10/11/201788. 10 November 2017: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 10/11/2017 hasta 28/02/201899. 28 February 2018: Comisión de Justicia Informe desde 28/02/2018 hasta 17/10/20181010. 17 October 2018: Comisión de Justicia Dictamen desde 17/10/2018 hasta 24/10/20181111. 24 October 2018: Pleno Aprobación desde 24/10/2018 hasta 30/10/20181212. 30 October 2018: Senado desde 30/10/2018 hasta 12/12/20181313. 12 December 2018: Pleno Enmiendas o veto del Senado desde 12/12/2018 hasta 20/12/20181414. 20 December 2018: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 20/12/2018 hasta 22/01/2019

20 December 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 292 yes · 33 no · 19 abst.

Voted on: Overall vote on the Private Member's Organic Bill reforming Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, given its organic character.

This law had 19 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 16 of sitting 167· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-em and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Ciudadanos. 9 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 50 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 50
  • Against: 0
  • Abstained: 1
  • Tie: 1
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
84 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto19
7 in favour · 10 abst. · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
31 against · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
64 in favour · 2 against · 1 did not vote
GER9
9 abst.
Popular en el Congreso134
132 in favour · 2 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.