What it is
Bill would extend the special deadline for notifying the Public Prosecutor
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 25 September 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill to amend Law 42/2015, of October 5, reforming Law 1/2000, of January 7, on Civil Procedure, to guarantee the effectiveness of the acts of communication of the Public Prosecutor's Office.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000129· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would extend until January 1, 2020 the special regime for notifications to the Public Prosecutor's Office: the deadline in Article 151.2 of the Civil Procedure Act would be ten calendar days instead of the ordinary deadline.
- The explanatory preamble justifies the extension by the particularities of the Public Prosecutor's Office when handling cases and by the differences in case management among prosecutor's offices in different territories.
- The bill would enter into force on January 1, 2018.
Who it affects
- Public Prosecutor's Office (Ministerio Fiscal): It would have ten calendar days for court notifications until January 1, 2020.
- Courts: They would keep applying the special deadline when notifying the Public Prosecutor's Office.
- State Attorney General's Office (Fiscalía General del Estado): It requested the extension because of the difficulties of digital justice.
Words worth knowing
- Actos de comunicación
- Notifications and notices that a court sends to the parties in a case.
- Ministerio Fiscal
- The public body that appears in court to defend the law and citizens' rights.
- Días naturales
- Calendar days, including weekends and holidays.
- Proposición de ley
- A bill proposing a change to a law, not yet an approved law.
It summarizes the text passed by the full Congreso. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced25 September 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted28 September 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments21 November 2017Groups propose changes.
- Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary22 November 2017All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate23 November 2017The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE13 December 2017It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
23 November 2017
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Overall vote on the Private member's bill to amend Law 42/2015, of October 5, reforming Law 1/2000, of January 7, on Civil Procedure, to guarantee the effectiveness of the acts of communication of the Public Prosecutor's Office, as it is processed in single reading.
This law had 6 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 16 of sitting 89· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 5 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no · 17 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 5 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 0 no · 13 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no · 7 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Popular en el Congreso. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 46 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 46
- Against: 0
- Abstained: 4
- Tie: 2
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 81 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 19 | 4 in favour · 13 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 31 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 61 abst. · 6 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 8 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 127 in favour · 7 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000129
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 16 of sitting 89
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.