What it is
Bill to declare Franco-era courts and their rulings null and void
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 18 July 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.
Official title: Private member's bill for the legal reparation of the victims of Francoism through the declaration of nullity and illegitimacy of the courts constituted during the civil war and Francoism, as well as of their issued sentences.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000122· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would declare illegitimate and null the courts, juries and any other criminal or administrative bodies set up during the Civil War to impose convictions or sanctions for political, ideological or religious reasons, as well as their rulings.
- It would also declare, in all cases, the illegitimacy and nullity of the Court for the Repression of Freemasonry and Communism, the Public Order Court, the Courts of Political Responsibilities and the Courts Martial set up for those reasons, for violating the right to a fair trial.
- In addition, it would declare null the convictions and sanctions issued during the Dictatorship against those who defended the previous legal order, sought to restore democracy in Spain, or tried to live according to rights and freedoms now recognized by the Constitution.
- Within six months of the law's approval, the Government would have to prepare a report on how the Historical Memory Law has been implemented and how victims have used it, to adjust measures to their demands and set up communication channels between authorities, victims and associations. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- Victims of Francoism and their families, who would see the convictions and sentences issued by those courts annulled.: Legal reparation: their convictions would no longer be valid.
- People convicted for political, ideological or religious reasons during the Civil War and the Dictatorship.: Their sanctions and rulings would be declared null.
- The Government, which would have to prepare a report within six months on the implementation of the Historical Memory Law.: New duty to report and to open communication channels with victims and associations.
- Victims' associations, which would have communication channels with the competent authorities.: Participation in adjusting reparation measures.
Words worth knowing
- Nulidad (nullity)
- Something has no legal value at all, as if it had never existed.
- Ilegitimidad (illegitimacy)
- Something is declared contrary to the law or to justice, even if it is not always annulled.
- Consejo de guerra (court martial)
- A military court that tried people, mostly civilians, for crimes against the regime.
- Proposición de ley (bill)
- A text by which a group of lawmakers proposes a new law; it is not yet an approved law.
- Ley de Memoria Histórica (Historical Memory Law)
- A 2007 law that recognized rights for those who suffered persecution during the civil war and the dictatorship.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced18 July 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted5 September 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments24 November 2017Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
14 November 2017
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the Mixed Parliamentary Group, for the legal reparation of the victims of Francoism through the declaration of nullity and illegitimacy of the courts constituted during the civil war and Francoism, as well as of their issued sentences.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 85· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant Tie 5 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 22 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Cantabria Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 14 yes · 11 no · 6 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 3 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 6 no · 2 abst.
- Valladolid More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 20 most voted in favour; in 15, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 20
- Against: 15
- Tie: 17
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 82 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 19 | 16 in favour · 3 against |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 31 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 63 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 127 against · 7 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000122
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 85
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.