What it is
Bill would require daily recording of each worker's hours
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 15 June 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill amending Article 34 of Royal Legislative Decree 2/2015, of October 23, approving the consolidated text of the Workers' Statute Law, to include the obligation to register daily and including the specific entry and exit time for each worker.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000109· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would require companies to record each worker's working day daily, including the exact clock-in and clock-out time.
- It would add a new right for workers to a regular distribution of their working hours, making irregular distribution only an exception.
- Companies would have to keep the time records for four years and hold them at the workplace for the Labor and Social Security Inspectorate.
- How the time records are organized and how workers access them would be set out in the applicable collective agreements.
- Failing to keep the time records or breaching working time limits would become a serious offense, not just a formal paperwork issue.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Employees: They would have the right to have their working day recorded daily and to a regular distribution of their hours.
- Companies: They would have to keep daily time records for four years and could face serious penalties if they do not.
- Labor and Social Security Inspectorate: It could check the records at the workplace to verify compliance with working time rules.
- Collective agreements: They would set out how the time records are organized and how workers can access them.
Words worth knowing
- Estatuto de los Trabajadores
- The main Spanish law on workers' rights and duties.
- Convenio colectivo
- Collective agreement negotiated by unions and employers that sets working conditions for a sector or company.
- Distribución irregular de la jornada
- Spreading working hours unevenly over the year according to the company's needs.
- Infracción grave
- Serious violation of labor law that can lead to a fine for the company.
- Horas extraordinarias
- Overtime hours worked beyond the usual working day.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced15 June 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted20 June 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments27 October 2017Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
17 October 2017
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Of the Socialist Parliamentary Group, amending Article 34 of Royal Legislative Decree 2/2015, of 23 October, approving the consolidated text of the Workers' Statute Act, to include the obligation to register daily and including the specific entry and exit time for each worker.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 78· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 6 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 14 yes · 0 no · 11 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cádiz More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Ceuta Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Guadalajara Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- La Rioja More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- León More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Lugo More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Madrid More votes in favour 14 yes · 0 no · 16 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 6 abst.
- Melilla Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Murcia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 7 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Palencia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Salamanca More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 5 abst.
- Soria More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Tarragona More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 8 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Gcup-ec-em.
By province: in 12 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 12
- Against: 0
- Abstained: 25
- Tie: 15
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 79 in favour · 5 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 19 | 8 in favour · 8 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 32 abst. |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 66 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 9 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 124 abst. · 10 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000109
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 78
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.