What it is
Bill to make it easier for companies to donate food to charities
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 9 June 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill to promote and facilitate food donation.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000106· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill aims to cut food waste: Spain throws away 7.7 million tons of food every year, and the goal is to send as much of it as possible to food banks and charities.
- The main obstacle to donating is that companies fear civil liability if the food causes problems. To fix this, the bill would adopt the so-called 'Good Samaritan law', which Italy adopted in 2003 and which multiplied its food donations twelvefold in ten years.
- The bill would add a provision to the Food Safety and Nutrition Law: nonprofit organizations that meet certain requirements would be treated as final consumers by food donors. This means the donor would not take on the duties of a food business operator, although the charity keeps those duties toward its beneficiaries.
- If passed, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Companies and institutions that donate food: They would face less civil liability risk and fewer hygiene, date-labeling or packaging hurdles when donating.
- Nonprofit organizations (food banks, charities): They would be treated as final consumers by donors, but would keep their duties as food business operators toward their beneficiaries.
- Disadvantaged people and groups: They would receive more donated food through social organizations.
Words worth knowing
- Responsabilidad civil (civil liability)
- The duty to pay or answer for damage your actions cause to another person.
- Ley del buen samaritano (Good Samaritan law)
- A rule that protects good-faith food donors so they are not liable for possible harm, except in serious cases.
- Consumidor final (final consumer)
- A person who receives food for their own use, not to sell or distribute it.
- Operador alimentario (food business operator)
- A company or organization involved in the food chain: producing, processing, distributing or selling food.
- Alimentos perecederos (perishable foods)
- Foods that spoil quickly, such as fresh fruit, meat or fish.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced9 June 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted20 June 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments8 September 2017Groups propose changes.
- Committee15 November 2017A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
29 June 2017
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, to promote and facilitate food donation.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 64· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 17 yes · 0 no · 12 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Madrid More votes in favour 27 yes · 0 no · 8 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 13 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso.
By province: in 50 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 50
- Against: 0
- Abstained: 1
- Tie: 1
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 81 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 19 | 18 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 32 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 66 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 7 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 132 in favour · 2 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000106
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 64
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.