Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would allow hunting and fishing invasive species in old areas

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 29 May 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill to amend Law 42/2007, of 13 December, on Natural Heritage and Biodiversity.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000103· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill responds to a 2016 Spanish Supreme Court ruling that banned hunting and fishing several species listed as invasive exotic species, with negative economic effects in rural towns and on sectors such as hunting, sport fishing and some food companies.
  2. The bill would allow hunting and fishing these species in the areas they occupied before 2007, as a way to control or eradicate them. Outside those areas, sport hunting and fishing would be banned to discourage illegal releases.
  3. It would also define zoogenetic resources, regulate aquaculture under a 2007 European regulation, and allow releases of rainbow trout only with sterile specimens, to protect the common trout.
  4. In addition, it would create an exceptional mechanism to lift some bans on listed species when there is a first-order public interest and guarantees of no harm to native biodiversity. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the official state gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • Hunters and sport fishers: They could hunt or fish invasive species within areas occupied before 2007, but not outside them.
  • Autonomous communities (comunidades autónomas): They would manage the mapping of those areas and could create their own catalogs of invasive species.
  • Rural municipalities: The negative economic impact caused by the ban on these sport and tourism activities would be reduced.
  • Aquaculture and food companies: Their activity with listed species, such as rainbow trout or red crab, would be regulated with more legal certainty.

Words worth knowing

Especies exóticas invasoras (invasive exotic species)
Species from outside the area that, once introduced, threaten local species, habitats or ecosystems.
Recursos zoogenéticos (zoogenetic resources)
Animal species used, or that can be used, to produce food or for farming and livestock.
Acuicultura (aquaculture)
Raising aquatic animals and plants, such as fish, for use or consumption.
Catálogo (catalog)
Official list of species. Including a species in it brings bans on possessing, transporting and trading it.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced29 May 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted6 June 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2017Jun 2017Jun 2017Jun 201711. 29 May 2017: Presentación22. 6 June 2017: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 06/06/2017 hasta 09/06/201733. 6 June 2017: Calificación44. 9 June 2017: Gobierno Contestación desde 09/06/2017 hasta 14/06/201755. 14 June 2017: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 14/06/2017 hasta 20/06/201766. 20 June 2017: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 20/06/2017 hasta 23/06/2017

20 June 2017

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 143 yes · 158 no · 34 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill of the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, amending Act 42/2007, of 13 December, on Natural Heritage and Biodiversity.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 60· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 16 most voted in favour; in 18, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 16
  • Against: 18
  • Tie: 18
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
81 against · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto19
11 in favour · 4 against · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
32 abst.
Gcup-ec-em67
64 against · 3 did not vote
GER9
9 against
Popular en el Congreso134
128 in favour · 6 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.