What it is
Bill would allow hunting and fishing invasive species in old areas
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 29 May 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill to amend Law 42/2007, of 13 December, on Natural Heritage and Biodiversity.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000103· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill responds to a 2016 Spanish Supreme Court ruling that banned hunting and fishing several species listed as invasive exotic species, with negative economic effects in rural towns and on sectors such as hunting, sport fishing and some food companies.
- The bill would allow hunting and fishing these species in the areas they occupied before 2007, as a way to control or eradicate them. Outside those areas, sport hunting and fishing would be banned to discourage illegal releases.
- It would also define zoogenetic resources, regulate aquaculture under a 2007 European regulation, and allow releases of rainbow trout only with sterile specimens, to protect the common trout.
- In addition, it would create an exceptional mechanism to lift some bans on listed species when there is a first-order public interest and guarantees of no harm to native biodiversity. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the official state gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Hunters and sport fishers: They could hunt or fish invasive species within areas occupied before 2007, but not outside them.
- Autonomous communities (comunidades autónomas): They would manage the mapping of those areas and could create their own catalogs of invasive species.
- Rural municipalities: The negative economic impact caused by the ban on these sport and tourism activities would be reduced.
- Aquaculture and food companies: Their activity with listed species, such as rainbow trout or red crab, would be regulated with more legal certainty.
Words worth knowing
- Especies exóticas invasoras (invasive exotic species)
- Species from outside the area that, once introduced, threaten local species, habitats or ecosystems.
- Recursos zoogenéticos (zoogenetic resources)
- Animal species used, or that can be used, to produce food or for farming and livestock.
- Acuicultura (aquaculture)
- Raising aquatic animals and plants, such as fish, for use or consumption.
- Catálogo (catalog)
- Official list of species. Including a species in it brings bans on possessing, transporting and trading it.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced29 May 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted6 June 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
20 June 2017
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, amending Act 42/2007, of 13 December, on Natural Heritage and Biodiversity.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 60· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant Tie 4 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Araba/Álava Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Asturias Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 19 no · 4 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Cantabria Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Girona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Granada More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes against 12 yes · 15 no · 6 abst.
- Málaga Tie 4 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 4 yes · 7 no · 1 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 6 yes · 7 no · 2 abst.
- Valladolid Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 16 most voted in favour; in 18, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 16
- Against: 18
- Tie: 18
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 81 against · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 19 | 11 in favour · 4 against · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 32 abst. |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 64 against · 3 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 9 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 128 in favour · 6 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000103
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 60
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.