Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill against LGBTI discrimination and for real equality

Committee step 4 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 4 May 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.

Official title: Private member's bill against discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, and sexual characteristics, and for the social equality of lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transsexuals, transgender, and intersexuals.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000097· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would guarantee real and effective equality for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transsexual, transgender and intersex people, and their families, banning all discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, and sex characteristics in both the public and private sectors.
  2. It would create an independent State Agency against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity, which would advise, issue reports, inspect and sanction violations of the law.
  3. In health care, it would base care for transsexual and transgender people on free gender self-determination, with no psychological or psychiatric tests to determine their condition, and would ban therapies that try to reverse sexual orientation or gender identity.
  4. In education, it would create a comprehensive plan with respect for sexual, gender and family diversity in all subjects, teacher training, and a protocol against school bullying of LGBTI students.
  5. In employment, it would classify transsexual and transgender people as at risk of social exclusion, with a job insertion plan and tax breaks for their hiring.
  6. It would recognize the right to gender self-determination and provide that changing one's name and registered sex on documents would be free and would not require a diagnosis or medical treatment, including for minors.
  7. It would set up a sanction system with fines of up to €45,000 for very serious violations, such as firing someone because of their sexual orientation or performing conversion therapies.
  8. It would create the National Center for LGBTI Historical Memory, which would hold, with free public access, the archives and records of the history and repression of the collective in Spain.

Who it affects

  • LGBTI people and their families: They would be the main beneficiaries: they would gain new rights and protection against discrimination in health care, education, work, sports and public services.
  • Children and teenagers: They would have anti-bullying protocols and special protection in youth centers, with respect for their gender identity.
  • Businesses and venue owners: They would have to avoid discrimination in employment and in access to goods and services, and could be fined if they fail to do so.
  • Public administrations and professionals: Health workers, teachers, police and public staff would have duties of training, prevention and action when facing discrimination.

Words worth knowing

Proposición de ley
A bill introduced by a parliamentary group. It is not an approved law until the Congress and the Senate vote for it.
Discriminación múltiple
Multiple discrimination: suffering discrimination for several reasons at once, for example being a trans person and also a migrant.
Despatologización
Depathologization: no longer treating trans identity as an illness or disorder.
Violencia intragénero
Intragender violence: violence within a same-sex couple, with effects similar to gender-based violence.
Derecho de admisión
Right of admission: a venue's power to decide who may enter. The bill would ban using it to discriminate.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced4 May 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted8 May 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments29 September 2017Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee14 February 2018A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2017Sept 2017Dec 2017Mar 2018Jun 2018Sept 2018Dec 201811. 4 May 2017: Presentación22. 8 May 2017: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 08/05/2017 hasta 12/05/201733. 8 May 2017: Calificación44. 12 May 2017: Gobierno Contestación desde 12/05/2017 hasta 19/06/201755. 19 June 2017: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 19/06/2017 hasta 19/09/201766. 19 September 2017: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 19/09/2017 hasta 21/09/201777. 21 September 2017: Comisión de Igualdad Publicación desde 21/09/2017 hasta 29/09/201788. 29 September 2017: Comisión de Igualdad Enmiendas desde 29/09/2017 hasta 28/02/201899. 14 February 2018: Comisión de Igualdad Mesa - Calificación desde 14/02/2018 hasta 14/02/2018 Nota: La Mesa, en su reunión con los Portavoces de 13/02/2018, califica la enmienda a la totalidad de texto alternativo.1010. 14 February 2018: Comisión de Igualdad Debate de totalidad desde 14/02/2018 hasta 22/02/20181111. 28 February 2018: Comisión de Igualdad Informe desde 28/02/2018 hasta 05/03/20191212. 5 March 2019: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 05/03/2019 hasta 27/03/2019

22 February 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 131 yes · 207 no

Voted on: Vote on the amendment to the whole of the alternative text to the Private Member's Bill against discrimination by sexual orientation, gender identity or expression and sexual characteristics, and for the social equality of lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transsexuals, transgender and intersexuals, submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 8 of sitting 102· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 12 most voted in favour; in 27, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 12
  • Against: 27
  • Tie: 13
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
80 against · 4 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Mixto19
3 in favour · 14 against · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
32 against
Gcup-ec-em67
67 against
GER9
9 against
Popular en el Congreso134
128 in favour · 6 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.