Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Faster recovery of illegally occupied homes

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 20 January 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 1/2000, of 7 January, on Civil Procedure, regarding the illegal occupation of dwellings.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000061· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would allow individuals who own or legitimately possess a home, nonprofit entities entitled to possess it, and public entities owning social housing to request the immediate recovery of full possession when deprived of it without their consent.
  2. The lawsuit could be filed against unknown occupants of the home, without identifying them in advance, and the document proving the right to possess it must be attached.
  3. If the plaintiff requests immediate delivery, occupants would have five days to provide a document justifying their situation. If they do not, and the plaintiff's document is sufficient, the court would order immediate delivery of the home, with no appeal possible against that decision.
  4. If defendants do not answer the lawsuit, a judgment would be issued immediately, and a favorable judgment could be enforced without waiting the twenty days required under the general rule.
  5. When an eviction date is set for an occupied home, or occupants are identified, social services would be notified, with the occupants' consent, so they can act in cases of vulnerability. Public administrations would have to coordinate and create registries of available social housing.
  6. The entry into force of the Civil Registry Law would be postponed until June 30, 2020, and this bill would enter into force twenty days after its publication in the Official State Gazette.

Who it affects

  • Individual homeowners: Could request the immediate recovery of their home when occupied without their consent.
  • Nonprofit and public entities with social housing: Would have a fast legal channel to recover social housing units that are occupied.
  • Illegal occupants of homes: Would have five days to justify their situation and could be evicted immediately if they do not.
  • Social services and public administrations: Would receive notices of evictions and vulnerable situations and would have to coordinate their response.

Words worth knowing

Lanzamiento (eviction)
A court order to leave the home and remove the belongings inside it.
Título (title document)
A document proving the right to possess something, such as a deed or a contract.
Tutela sumaria (summary protection)
Fast and simple court protection, without a full trial.
Vacatio
The period between the approval of a law and its entry into force.

It summarizes the text passed by the committee. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced20 January 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted26 January 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments27 March 2017Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee20 September 2017A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate24 April 2018The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE6 June 2018It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2017Jun 2017Sept 2017Dec 2017Mar 201811. 20 January 2017: Presentación22. 26 January 2017: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 26/01/2017 hasta 30/01/201733. 26 January 2017: Calificación44. 30 January 2017: Gobierno Contestación desde 30/01/2017 hasta 07/03/201755. 7 March 2017: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 07/03/2017 hasta 14/03/201766. 14 March 2017: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 14/03/2017 hasta 21/03/201777. 21 March 2017: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 21/03/2017 hasta 27/03/201788. 27 March 2017: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 27/03/2017 hasta 20/09/201799. 20 September 2017: Comisión de Justicia Informe desde 20/09/2017 hasta 19/04/20181010. 19 April 2018: Comisión de Justicia Aprobación con competencia legislativa plena desde 19/04/2018 hasta 24/04/20181111. 24 April 2018: Senado desde 24/04/2018 hasta 06/06/20181212. 6 June 2018: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 06/06/2018 hasta 26/06/2018

14 March 2017

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 176 yes · 162 no

Voted on: Private member's bill from the Mixed Parliamentary Group amending Law 1/2000, of January 7, on Civil Procedure, regulating a specific procedure to guarantee the possession of dwellings owned by natural persons and to ensure the availability of dwellings held by social entities and public administrations for social rental.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 35· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 7 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 23 most voted in favour; in 10, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 23
  • Against: 10
  • Tie: 19
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
84 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto19
10 in favour · 7 against · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
31 in favour · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
63 against · 4 did not vote
GER9
8 against · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso134
130 in favour · 4 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.