Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to make marriage easier for people with disabilities

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 17 January 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 15/2015, of 2 July, on Voluntary Jurisdiction.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000059· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would change Article 56 of the Civil Code so that, before getting married, people with disabilities can receive human, technical and material supports that help them give and understand their marital consent.
  2. A medical report would only be required in exceptional cases, when a health condition clearly prevents giving consent despite those supports. Under the previously approved text, such a report was required for anyone with mental, intellectual or sensory impairments.
  3. The bill would also adjust Article 58 of the Civil Registry Law with the same rules on supports and exceptional medical reports, and would delay the entry into force of these marriage rules until that law is fully in force.

Who it affects

  • People with disabilities who want to get married: Could marry with supports and without an automatic medical report, except in exceptional cases.
  • Judicial secretaries (Letrados de la Administración de Justicia), notaries and Civil Registry officials: Would have to offer supports and request the medical report only in exceptional cases.
  • Government bodies and social initiative organizations defending the rights of people with disabilities: Could be called on to provide those supports to the future spouses.

Words worth knowing

Dictamen médico
A written medical report on whether a person is able to do something, here to give their consent to marriage.
Consentimiento matrimonial
The free acceptance each future spouse gives to get married.
Registro Civil
Civil Registry, the public office where key life events such as births and marriages are recorded.

It summarizes the text passed by the Senado. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced17 January 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted19 January 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments17 February 2017Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee22 March 2017A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate25 April 2017The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE22 June 2017It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 13 official steps on a timeline
Jan 2017Feb 2017Mar 2017Apr 2017May 201711. 17 January 2017: Presentación22. 19 January 2017: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 19/01/2017 hasta 23/01/201733. 19 January 2017: Calificación44. 23 January 2017: Gobierno Contestación desde 23/01/2017 hasta 25/01/201755. 25 January 2017: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 25/01/2017 hasta 02/02/201766. 2 February 2017: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 02/02/2017 hasta 14/02/201777. 14 February 2017: Comisión para las Políticas Integrales de la Discapacidad Publicación desde 14/02/2017 hasta 17/02/201788. 17 February 2017: Comisión para las Políticas Integrales de la Discapacidad Enmiendas desde 17/02/2017 hasta 22/03/201799. 22 March 2017: Comisión para las Políticas Integrales de la Discapacidad Informe desde 22/03/2017 hasta 04/04/20171010. 4 April 2017: Comisión para las Políticas Integrales de la Discapacidad Aprobación con competencia legislativa plena desde 04/04/2017 hasta 25/04/20171111. 25 April 2017: Senado desde 25/04/2017 hasta 14/06/20171212. 14 June 2017: Pleno Enmiendas o veto del Senado desde 14/06/2017 hasta 22/06/20171313. 22 June 2017: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 22/06/2017 hasta 05/09/2017

22 June 2017

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 344 yes · 0 no

Voted on: The amendments from the Senate are voted on jointly.

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 8 of sitting 62· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em, GER and Popular en el Congreso.

By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 52
  • Against: 0
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
84 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto19
16 in favour · 3 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
31 in favour · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
66 in favour · 1 did not vote
GER9
9 in favour
Popular en el Congreso134
133 in favour · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.