Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to repeal the public security law known as the 'gag law'

Committee step 4 of 7 · Withdrawn

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 1 December 2016. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's Organic bill on the Protection of Public Safety and the repeal of Organic Act 4/2015, of 30 March, on the protection of public safety.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000050· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The Socialist Parliamentary Group introduces this bill to repeal organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. 4/2015 on citizen security, known as the 'gag law', and to restore most of the legislation in force before it took effect. This is not an approved law, only the initial text filed in Congress.
  2. The statement of reasons argues that the 2015 law cuts fundamental rights such as assembly, demonstration and freedom of information, and that it allowed the so-called hot returns of migrants in Ceuta and Melilla. It calls for a law more respectful of rights, with guarantees and proportionality in penalties.
  3. The proposed text restores the preventive measures of the earlier law: rules on weapons and explosives, public shows, personal documents (the national ID card would be mandatory from age fourteen), record-keeping for activities such as lodging or trading in jewelry, and security measures at establishments.
  4. It regulates police actions to maintain security: identifying people in public spaces (with a maximum of six hours at police facilities if identification is not possible any other way), dissolving demonstrations in the cases set by the assembly law, entering and searching homes only in constitutionally allowed cases, and coercive fines of up to 150 euros for ignoring orders.
  5. The penalty system distinguishes minor, serious and very serious offenses. The proposed fines range from up to €300.51 for minor offenses to between €30,050.62 and €601,012.1 for very serious ones, and offenses expire after three months, one year or two years. For foreigners, penalties for serious or very serious offenses could be replaced by expulsion from Spain.
  6. The repealing provision repeals Organic Law 4/2015 and also the tenth additional provision of the foreigners law, which allowed hot returns. The Government is authorized to update fine amounts based on the Consumer Price Index.

Who it affects

  • The general public: They would be affected by the proposed rules on identification, personal documents and behavior in public spaces.
  • Organizers of demonstrations and public shows: They would have to meet the requirements of the assembly law and show regulations, with penalties if they do not.
  • Businesses and establishments (weapons, lodging, jewelry, entertainment venues): They would have to keep records, adopt security measures and respect authorizations and opening hours.
  • Foreign nationals: Serious or very serious penalties could be replaced by expulsion from Spain.

Words worth knowing

Ley Orgánica (Organic Law)
A law reserved for major matters, such as fundamental rights, which requires a special majority in Congress to pass.
Derogar (repeal)
To invalidate a law or part of it.
Devoluciones en caliente (hot returns)
Immediate expulsion of migrants who cross the fences of Ceuta or Melilla, without an individual process beforehand.
Prescribir (statute of limitations)
When the deadline to penalize an offense or collect a penalty passes, so it can no longer be done.
Recurso de inconstitucionalidad (constitutional challenge)
A request to the Constitutional Court to review whether a law contradicts the Constitution.
organic law
A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is withdrawn.

  1. Introduced1 December 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted13 December 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments3 April 2017Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee13 September 2017A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2016Mar 2017Jun 2017Sept 2017Dec 2017Mar 2018Jun 2018Sept 201811. 1 December 2016: Presentación22. 13 December 2016: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 13/12/2016 hasta 16/12/201633. 13 December 2016: Calificación44. 16 December 2016: Gobierno Contestación desde 16/12/2016 hasta 24/02/201755. 24 February 2017: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 24/02/2017 hasta 21/03/201766. 21 March 2017: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 21/03/2017 hasta 28/03/201777. 28 March 2017: Comisión de Interior Publicación desde 28/03/2017 hasta 03/04/201788. 3 April 2017: Comisión de Interior Enmiendas desde 03/04/2017 hasta 28/02/201899. 13 September 2017: Comisión de Interior Mesa - Calificación desde 13/09/2017 hasta 13/09/20171010. 13 September 2017: Comisión de Interior Debate de totalidad desde 13/09/2017 hasta 21/09/20171111. 28 February 2018: Comisión de Interior Informe desde 28/02/2018 hasta 23/10/20181212. 23 October 2018: Concluido- (Subsumido en otra iniciativa) desde 23/10/2018 hasta 23/10/2018

21 September 2017

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 11 yes · 252 no · 72 abst.

Voted on: Vote on the amendment to the whole of the alternative text to the Organic Private member's bill on the Protection of Public Safety and repeal of Organic Law 4/2015, of 30 March, on the protection of public safety, submitted by the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Ms. Beitialarrangoitia).

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 17 of sitting 72· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of GER. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 12 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 49, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 49
  • Abstained: 3
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
84 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Mixto19
5 in favour · 4 against · 8 abst. · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
31 against · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
1 in favour · 1 against · 63 abst. · 2 did not vote
GER9
5 in favour · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso134
127 against · 7 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

Whoever introduced it withdrew it, or it was merged into another one. It goes no further.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.