What it is
Bill would decriminalize peaceful strike pickets in Spain
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 16 September 2016. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.
Official title: Private member's bill, Organic Law amending Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, of the Penal Code.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000025· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would remove the aggravated crime of coercion in the context of strikes from Article 315.3 of the Criminal Code, which punishes with prison those who coerce others into starting or continuing a strike. Instead, it would punish those who prevent or limit union freedom or the right to strike through deceit or taking advantage of someone's situation of need, with harsher penalties if force, violence or intimidation is used.
- Pending cases for the crime in Article 315.3 would be dismissed, and existing convictions would be reviewed to annul them, at the request of the Public Prosecutor's Office within a maximum of 15 days.
- If someone were already serving a prison sentence for that crime, it would be annulled, their criminal record would be canceled, and they would be compensated for the time spent in prison. Fines would be refunded with interest.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Workers and union members prosecuted or convicted for the crime in Article 315.3: Their cases would be dismissed, their convictions annulled, their criminal records canceled and, where applicable, they would receive compensation.
- Workers on strike: They could organize informational pickets without risking criminal punishment for coercion.
- Unions: They would face less criminal pressure on their organizations and their strike-promotion activities.
- Employers or people who prevent strikes through deceit, taking advantage of need, force, violence or intimidation: They would still face criminal punishment, with aggravated penalties if they use force, violence or intimidation.
Words worth knowing
- Piquete informativo
- A group of people who inform workers that a strike is happening and peacefully ask them to join it.
- Sobreseimiento
- A decision to close a criminal case without a trial or conviction.
- Proposición de Ley Orgánica
- A bill filed in Congress to change a law affecting fundamental rights. It is not an approved law until it goes through the legislative process and is voted on.
- Antecedentes penales
- An official record of a person's criminal convictions.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced16 September 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted20 September 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments25 May 2017Groups propose changes.
- Committee31 October 2018A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 11 official steps on a timeline
15 November 2018
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Amendment to the whole with alternative text to the Organic Private member's bill to amend Organic Law 10/1995, of 23 November, of the Penal Code, submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 6 of sitting 158· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Almería Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 4 yes · 24 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 6 no
- Cantabria More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Cuenca Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes against 14 yes · 21 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 7 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia Tie 5 yes · 5 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em and GER. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 29, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 11
- Against: 29
- Tie: 12
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 1 in favour · 83 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Mixto | 19 | 3 in favour · 13 against · 3 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 30 against · 2 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 67 against |
| GER | 9 | 9 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 133 | 131 in favour · 2 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000025
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 6 of sitting 158
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.