What it is
Bill would limit pardons and require written reasons
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 1 August 2016. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill for the reform of the Law of June 18, 1870, on rules for the exercise of the Grace of Pardon.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000010· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would ban pardons for public authorities or officials convicted of corruption offenses committed while performing their duties or to gain an economic benefit, and also for convictions related to gender violence Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman..
- It would require every pardon to be granted through a reasoned Royal Decree stating the reasons of justice, equity, public utility, or social reintegration that justify it. Without those reasons or other required details, the pardon would be null and void.
- For a full pardon, the bill would require the judge or court that issued the sentence to find reasons of justice, equity, public utility, or the convicted person's social reintegration.
- The law would also apply to pardon cases still being processed when it takes effect, which would be the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- Public authorities and officials convicted of corruption offenses: They could not receive any pardon, full or partial, if the bill passes.
- People convicted of offenses related to gender violence: They could not receive a pardon.
- Convicted people seeking a full pardon: A full pardon would require the sentencing court's favorable judgment and justified reasons.
- The Government: It would have to give written reasons for every pardon in a Royal Decree published in the Official State Gazette.
Words worth knowing
- Indulto (pardon)
- A Government measure that forgives all or part of the sentence imposed on a convicted person.
- Real Decreto (Royal Decree)
- A rule signed by the King and approved by the Government; here, the document granting the pardon.
- Tribunal sentenciador (sentencing court)
- The judge or court that issued the conviction.
- Motivado (reasoned)
- That states in writing the reasons for the decision.
- gender violence
- Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced1 August 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted6 September 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments24 February 2017Groups propose changes.
- Committee7 February 2018A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
14 February 2017
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, for the reform of the Act of June 18, 1870, on rules for the exercise of the Grace of Pardon.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 27· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 27 yes · 0 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 35 yes · 0 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 11 yes · 0 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 16 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em, GER and Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 52
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 84 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 19 | 17 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 32 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 66 in favour · 1 against |
| GER | 9 | 7 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 132 in favour · 2 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Presented before in:
- XI Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill would limit and require reasons for government pardons
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000010
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 27
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.