Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would limit pardons and require written reasons

Committee step 4 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 1 August 2016. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's bill for the reform of the Law of June 18, 1870, on rules for the exercise of the Grace of Pardon.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000010· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would ban pardons for public authorities or officials convicted of corruption offenses committed while performing their duties or to gain an economic benefit, and also for convictions related to gender violence Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman..
  2. It would require every pardon to be granted through a reasoned Royal Decree stating the reasons of justice, equity, public utility, or social reintegration that justify it. Without those reasons or other required details, the pardon would be null and void.
  3. For a full pardon, the bill would require the judge or court that issued the sentence to find reasons of justice, equity, public utility, or the convicted person's social reintegration.
  4. The law would also apply to pardon cases still being processed when it takes effect, which would be the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.

Who it affects

  • Public authorities and officials convicted of corruption offenses: They could not receive any pardon, full or partial, if the bill passes.
  • People convicted of offenses related to gender violence: They could not receive a pardon.
  • Convicted people seeking a full pardon: A full pardon would require the sentencing court's favorable judgment and justified reasons.
  • The Government: It would have to give written reasons for every pardon in a Royal Decree published in the Official State Gazette.

Words worth knowing

Indulto (pardon)
A Government measure that forgives all or part of the sentence imposed on a convicted person.
Real Decreto (Royal Decree)
A rule signed by the King and approved by the Government; here, the document granting the pardon.
Tribunal sentenciador (sentencing court)
The judge or court that issued the conviction.
Motivado (reasoned)
That states in writing the reasons for the decision.
gender violence
Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced1 August 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted6 September 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments24 February 2017Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee7 February 2018A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2016Dec 2017Dec 201811. 1 August 2016: Presentación22. 6 September 2016: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 06/09/2016 hasta 09/09/201633. 6 September 2016: Calificación44. 9 September 2016: Gobierno Contestación desde 09/09/2016 hasta 17/10/201655. 17 October 2016: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 17/10/2016 hasta 14/02/201766. 14 February 2017: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 14/02/2017 hasta 21/02/201777. 21 February 2017: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 21/02/2017 hasta 24/02/201788. 24 February 2017: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 24/02/2017 hasta 07/02/201899. 7 February 2018: Comisión de Justicia Informe desde 07/02/2018 hasta 05/03/20191010. 5 March 2019: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 05/03/2019 hasta 27/03/2019

14 February 2017

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 343 yes · 1 no

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, for the reform of the Act of June 18, 1870, on rules for the exercise of the Grace of Pardon.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 27· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em, GER and Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 52
  • Against: 0
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
84 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto19
17 in favour · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
32 in favour
Gcup-ec-em67
66 in favour · 1 against
GER9
7 in favour · 2 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso134
132 in favour · 2 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.