What it is

Private member's bill on the establishment of a minimum income benefit in the scope of Social Security protection (corresponding to file numbers 120/000035/0000 of the X Legislature and 120/000003/0000 of the XI Legislature).

Committee step 4 of 7 · Unfinished

Type of initiative: iniciativa legislativa popular. It was introduced on 19 July 2016. Introduced by: Don José Campos Trujillo y otros.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 120/000002· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.

Introduced19 July 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted6 September 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendments17 February 2017Groups propose changes.
Committee9 September 2016A committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 15 official steps on a timeline

22 February 2018

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 168 yes · 170 no

Voted on: Request for the Plenary of the Chamber to take over the deliberation and final vote on the Private Member's Bill on the establishment of a minimum income benefit within the scope of Social Security protection, submitted by the Socialist Parliamentary Group.

This law had 3 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 9 of sitting 102· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 12 most voted in favour; in 25, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 12
Against: 25
Tie: 15

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	84	78 in favour · 1 against · 5 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 against
Mixto	19	14 in favour · 3 against · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos	32	32 against
Gcup-ec-em	67	67 in favour
GER	9	9 in favour
Popular en el Congreso	134	129 against · 5 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 120/000002
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 9 of sitting 102
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Private member's bill on the establishment of a minimum income benefit in the scope of Social Security protection (corresponding to file numbers 120/000035/0000 of the X Legislature and 120/000003/0000 of the XI Legislature). Automatic translation · See the Spanish original