Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion on achieving a national pact in educational matters.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 4 February 2016. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000067· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced4 February 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted9 February 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary12 February 2016All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Feb 2016Mar 201611. 4 February 2016: Presentación22. 9 February 2016: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 09/02/2016 hasta 12/02/201633. 9 February 2016: Calificación44. 12 February 2016: Pleno desde 12/02/2016 hasta 19/04/201655. 19 April 2016: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 19/04/2016 hasta 04/05/2016

19 April 2016

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 107 yes · 179 no · 38 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion of the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, regarding the achievement of a national pact on education. Voted in the terms resulting from the incorporation of the amendment of the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Mr. Martínez Oblanca).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 10· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gc-dl, GER and Gp-ec-em. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 10 most voted in favour; in 26, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 10
  • Against: 26
  • Tie: 15
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista89
85 against · 4 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto14
4 in favour · 9 against · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos40
37 abst. · 3 did not vote
Gc-dl8
7 against · 1 did not vote
GER9
9 against
Gp-ec-em65
63 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso119
103 in favour · 16 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.