What it is
Proposal to extend the Social Security discount for permanent contracts
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 11 March 2016. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 25/2015, of July 28, on the second chance mechanism, reduction of financial burden, and other social order measures.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000016· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would expand the so-called exempt minimum in Social Security contributions for new permanent contracts: the first 500 euros of the monthly base for common contingencies would be exempt from contributions.
- The benefit would go from lasting two years to four (48 months) per permanent contract, and would cover all common contingency contributions, both the employer's and the worker's share.
- The benefit would also apply to temporary contracts that become permanent, which was not the case before.
- It would be a bonus if the worker is registered in the National Youth Guarantee System, and a reduction for all other hired workers.
- Companies would have to meet several requirements: be up to date on tax and Social Security obligations, have not carried out wrongful or unlawful collective dismissals in the previous six months, increase permanent employment, and keep the employment level for 48 months.
- If the benefit is applied improperly, the amounts not paid in would have to be returned, with a surcharge and late-payment interest. If the employment level is not kept, part would be returned depending on the months elapsed, with no surcharge or interest.
Who it affects
- Companies that hire on a permanent basis: They could stop contributing for the first 500 euros of each worker's monthly base for 48 months, if they meet the requirements.
- Workers with a new permanent contract or one converted from temporary: Their employer would save part of the contributions, but their Social Security benefits would be calculated using the full contribution base, with no reduction.
- Young people registered in the National Youth Guarantee System: Their permanent hiring would qualify for a bonus compatible with other incentives under Law 18/2014.
- Beneficiaries of the Program for Activation for Employment: If they are hired permanently, it would be compatible with the financial support payment they receive.
Words worth knowing
- Mínimo exento
- Part of the salary exempt from Social Security contributions, which makes the contract cheaper for the employer.
- Contingencias comunes
- Contributions covering ordinary benefits, such as health care and retirement, as opposed to workplace accident coverage.
- Bonificación
- A discount on the contributions the company pays to Social Security.
- Reducción
- A lowering of the base on which contributions are calculated, which also lowers what is paid.
- Despido colectivo no ajustado a Derecho
- A collective layoff of many workers at once that a court declares unlawful.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced11 March 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted15 March 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
12 April 2016
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private Member's Bill of the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, for the modification of Law 25/2015, of 28 July, on the second chance mechanism, reduction of the financial burden and other measures of social order.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 8· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 3 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes against 2 yes · 18 no · 6 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Granada Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Guadalajara Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes against 11 yes · 16 no · 7 abst.
- Málaga Tie 4 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Segovia Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 3 yes · 6 no · 3 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes against 5 yes · 8 no · 2 abst.
- Valladolid Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Mixto, GER and Gp-ec-em. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 14 most voted in favour; in 23, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 14
- Against: 23
- Tie: 15
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 89 | 1 in favour · 84 against · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 abst. |
| Mixto | 14 | 3 in favour · 8 against · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 40 | 40 abst. |
| Gc-dl | 8 | 6 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 9 against |
| Gp-ec-em | 65 | 62 against · 3 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 119 | 111 in favour · 8 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000016
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 8
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.