Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Agreement by which, in accordance with Article 15 of Organic Law 2/2012, of 27 April, on Budgetary Stability and Financial Sustainability, the budgetary stability and public debt objectives are set for the whole of Public Administrations and each of their subsectors for the period 2013-2015 and the non-financial expenditure limit of the State Budget for 2013.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

Type of initiative: objetivo de estabilidad presupuestaria. It was introduced on 21 July 2012. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 430/000002· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced21 July 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted23 July 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary24 July 2012All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate24 July 2012The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE26 July 2012It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Jul 2012Jul 2012Aug 2012Aug 2012Aug 201211. 21 July 2012: Presentación22. 23 July 2012: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 23/07/2012 hasta 24/07/201233. 23 July 2012: Calificación44. 24 July 2012: Pleno Aprobación desde 24/07/2012 hasta 24/07/201255. 24 July 2012: Senado desde 24/07/2012 hasta 26/07/201266. 26 July 2012: Concluido - (Aprobado sin modificaciones) desde 26/07/2012 hasta 27/07/2012

24 July 2012

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 177 yes · 140 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Agreement by which, in accordance with Article 15 of Organic Law 2/2012, of 27 April, on Budgetary Stability and Financial Sustainability, the budgetary stability and public debt objectives are set for the whole of Public Administrations and each of their subsectors for the period 2013-2015 and the non-financial expenditure limit of the State Budget for 2013.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 50· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 36 most voted in favour; in 9, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 36
  • Against: 9
  • Tie: 7
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
103 against · 7 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Mixto18
1 in favour · 7 against · 1 abst. · 9 did not vote
GC-CiU16
1 in favour · 13 against · 2 did not vote
GIP11
8 against · 3 did not vote
GUPyD5
4 against · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso185
175 in favour · 10 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.