Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Declaration on the General State Accounts corresponding to the 2012 fiscal year.

Senate step 6 of 7

Type of initiative: cuenta general del estado. It was introduced on 5 November 2014. Introduced by: Tribunal de Cuentas.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 250/000007· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Senate.

  1. Introduced5 November 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted11 November 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committee11 November 2014A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary9 December 2014All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate9 December 2014The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
Nov 2014Nov 2014Nov 2014Nov 2014Dec 2014Dec 201411. 5 November 2014: Presentación22. 11 November 2014: Calificación33. 11 November 2014: Comisión Mixta para las Relaciones con el Tribunal de Cuentas Mesa - Acuerdo desde 11/11/2014 hasta 18/11/201444. 18 November 2014: Comisión Mixta para las Relaciones con el Tribunal de Cuentas Presentación de Informe desde 18/11/2014 hasta 25/11/201455. 25 November 2014: Comisión Mixta para las Relaciones con el Tribunal de Cuentas Informe desde 25/11/2014 hasta 09/12/201466. 9 December 2014: Comisión Mixta para las Relaciones con el Tribunal de Cuentas Dictamen desde 09/12/2014 hasta 09/12/201477. 9 December 2014: Pleno Aprobación desde 09/12/2014 hasta 18/12/201488. 9 December 2014: Senado desde 09/12/2014 hasta 17/12/201499. 18 December 2014: Concluido - (Tramitado con propuestas de resolución) desde 18/12/2014 hasta 15/01/2015

18 December 2014

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 299 yes · 14 no · 13 abst.

Voted on: Report of the Joint Committee for Relations with the Court of Auditors regarding the Statement on the General State Accounts for the 2012 fiscal year, as well as the Resolution adopted by said Committee.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 39 of sitting 236· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, GIP, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of GC-CiU. 7 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 48 most voted in favour; in 1, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 48
  • Against: 1
  • Tie: 3
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
103 in favour · 7 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 abst.
Mixto18
3 in favour · 2 against · 6 abst. · 7 did not vote
GC-CiU16
12 against · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote
GIP11
8 in favour · 3 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
180 in favour · 1 abst. · 4 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

If the Senate amends or vetoes it, it returns to the Congreso, which decides. Then it is published in the BOE.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.