Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Report on the state, functioning and activities of the General Council of the Judiciary and of the Courts and Tribunals of Justice, Report of the Supreme Court, corresponding to the year 2010, as well as the Speech of Opening of the Judicial Year together with the Chronicle of Case Law of the Supreme Court 2010-2011.

Admitted step 2 of 7

Type of initiative: . It was introduced on 23 January 2012. Introduced by: Consejo General del Poder Judicial.

Follow

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 245/000002· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 1 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted.

  1. Introduced23 January 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted31 January 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 2 official steps on a timeline
Jan 201211. 23 January 2012: Presentación22. 31 January 2012: Calificación

23 February 2012

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 132 yes · 181 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Proposal 84

This law had 37 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 37 of sitting 13· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and GIP. Against, most of GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 9 most voted in favour; in 37, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 9
  • Against: 37
  • Tie: 6
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
99 in favour · 1 against · 10 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
7 in favour · 1 against · 10 did not vote
GC-CiU16
12 in favour · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote
GIP11
8 in favour · 3 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 against
Popular en el Congreso185
2 in favour · 174 against · 9 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

Groups can now table amendments: proposed changes to the text.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error