What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the Government's policy regarding the injustices of the Judiciary, particularly in the case of Thalidomide.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a motion. It was introduced on 1 October 2015. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Catalán de Convergència i d'Unió.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000230· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

Introduced1 October 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted5 October 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary5 October 2015All 350 deputies vote.
Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOE13 October 2015It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 4 official steps on a timeline

13 October 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 319 yes · 0 no · 8 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Catalan Parliamentary Group of Convergència i d'Unió, on the Government's policy regarding the injustices of the Judiciary, particularly in the case of Thalidomide. Voted on in the terms of the compromise amendment submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group of the Congress, the Socialist Parliamentary Group and the Catalan Parliamentary Group of Convergència y d'Unió.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 6 of sitting 290· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP, GUPyD, Sin grupo and Popular en el Congreso. 8 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 52
Against: 0

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	108	102 in favour · 1 abst. · 5 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto	18	8 in favour · 7 abst. · 3 did not vote
GC-CiU	16	15 in favour · 1 did not vote
GIP	11	9 in favour · 2 did not vote
GUPyD	5	5 in favour
Sin grupo	2	2 in favour
Popular en el Congreso	185	174 in favour · 11 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000230
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 6 of sitting 290
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the Government's policy regarding the injustices of the Judiciary, particularly in the case of Thalidomide. Automatic translation · See the Spanish original