Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the policy the Government is carrying out in relation to the public health crisis generated after the first case of Ebola virus infection in Spain.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 16 October 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000177· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced16 October 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted21 October 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary21 October 2014All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Oct 201411. 16 October 2014: Presentación22. 21 October 2014: Calificación33. 21 October 2014: Pleno desde 21/10/2014 hasta 28/10/201444. 28 October 2014: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 28/10/2014 hasta 05/11/2014

28 October 2014

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 136 yes · 175 no · 21 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, on the policy being carried out by the Government regarding the public health crisis generated after the first case of Ebola virus contagion in Spain. Voted in the terms of the transactional amendment submitted by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, the Parliamentary Group of IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: La Izquierda Plural, and the Parliamentary Group of Unión Progreso y Democracia.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 219· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Sin grupo and Popular en el Congreso. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 7 most voted in favour; in 36, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 7
  • Against: 36
  • Abstained: 2
  • Tie: 7
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
108 in favour · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
9 in favour · 5 abst. · 4 did not vote
GC-CiU16
16 abst.
GIP11
10 in favour · 1 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Sin grupo1
1 against
Popular en el Congreso184
174 against · 10 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.