Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on whether the Government definitively rules out the presentation of the Law on the protection of the life of the conceived and the rights of the pregnant woman.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 25 September 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: La Izquierda Plural.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000172· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced25 September 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted30 September 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary30 September 2014All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Sept 201411. 25 September 2014: Presentación22. 30 September 2014: Calificación33. 30 September 2014: Pleno desde 30/09/2014 hasta 09/10/201444. 9 October 2014: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 09/10/2014 hasta 15/10/2014

9 October 2014

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 121 yes · 182 no · 8 abst.

Voted on: By the IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: The Plural Left Parliamentary Group, on whether the Government definitively rules out the submission of the Law on the protection of the life of the conceived and the rights of the pregnant woman. Voted in the terms resulting from the incorporation of the amendment by the Socialist Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 211· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto and GIP. Against, most of GC-CiU and Popular en el Congreso. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 8 most voted in favour; in 38, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 8
  • Against: 38
  • Tie: 6
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
97 in favour · 13 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
10 in favour · 1 against · 7 did not vote
GC-CiU16
1 in favour · 8 against · 4 abst. · 3 did not vote
GIP11
8 in favour · 3 did not vote
GUPyD5
4 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso184
173 against · 11 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.