Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the measures the Government intends to adopt to combat gender violence, from the evaluation of the policies implemented and in the face of the evidence of the regression occurring in this fight.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 11 September 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000168· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced11 September 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted16 September 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary16 September 2014All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Sept 201411. 11 September 2014: Presentación22. 16 September 2014: Calificación33. 16 September 2014: Pleno desde 16/09/2014 hasta 18/09/201444. 18 September 2014: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 18/09/2014 hasta 24/09/2014

18 September 2014

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 140 yes · 170 no

Voted on: From the Socialista Parliamentary Group, on the measures the Government intends to adopt to combat gender violence, based on the evaluation of policies implemented and in light of the evidence of the setback occurring in this fight. Voted in the terms of the transactional amendment submitted by the Socialista Parliamentary Group, the Catalan Parliamentary Group (Convergència i Unió) and the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Mrs. Jordà).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 205· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 9 most voted in favour; in 34, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 9
  • Against: 34
  • Tie: 8
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
99 in favour · 11 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
9 in favour · 1 against · 8 did not vote
GC-CiU16
15 in favour · 1 did not vote
GIP11
8 in favour · 3 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
169 against · 16 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.