Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the Government's policy in relation to the recognition of the provinces of Teruel, Soria and Cuenca as sparsely populated areas within the European Union, in order to obtain the aid provided by the Structural Funds and the European Social Fund for areas with that problem.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

Type of initiative: . It was introduced on 29 May 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: La Izquierda Plural.

Follow

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000158· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced29 May 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted3 June 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEno dateIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 2 official steps on a timeline
May 201411. 29 May 2014: Presentación22. 3 June 2014: Calificación

26 June 2014

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 115 yes · 191 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Point 2

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 195· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto and GIP. Against, most of GC-CiU, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 4 most voted in favour; in 39, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 4
  • Against: 39
  • Tie: 8
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
92 in favour · 18 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
7 in favour · 2 abst. · 9 did not vote
GC-CiU16
10 against · 6 did not vote
GIP11
11 in favour
GUPyD5
5 against
Popular en el Congreso185
176 against · 9 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error