What it is
Motion following an urgent interpellation to the Minister of Finance and Public Administrations on the functioning of the State Tax Administration Agency (AEAT), especially in relation to the organizational criteria of its current political heads and the regularity of tax proceedings affecting large taxpayers.
It is a motion. It was introduced on 12 December 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000125· updated 11 Nov
We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced12 December 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted17 December 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
- Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary17 December 2013All 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
17 December 2013
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation to the Minister of Finance and Public Administrations on the functioning of the State Tax Administration Agency (AEAT), especially regarding the organizational criteria of its current political heads and the regularity of tax proceedings affecting major taxpayers. Voted in the terms resulting from the incorporation of the additional amendment submitted by the Parliamentary Group of Union, Progress and Democracy.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 6 of sitting 157· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 4 yes · 8 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 13 yes · 6 no · 8 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 17 yes · 14 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 5 most voted in favour; in 36, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 5
- Against: 36
- Abstained: 2
- Tie: 9
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 104 in favour · 6 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 9 in favour · 1 against · 4 abst. · 4 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 15 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 11 in favour |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 170 against · 15 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000125
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 6 of sitting 157
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.