What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the correction of the unfair autonomous community funding system and the need for specific budget lines in the 2014 General State Budgets to address the severe deterioration of public services and the dramatic unemployment situation in the Canary Islands.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 9 October 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000110· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

Introduced9 October 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted15 October 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary15 October 2013All 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 4 official steps on a timeline

17 October 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 134 yes · 179 no

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Mr. Quevedo), on the correction of the unjust autonomous financing system and the need for specific items in the General State Budget for the year 2014 to alleviate the serious deterioration of public services and the dramatic unemployment situation in the Canary Islands. Voted in the terms resulting from the incorporation of the addition amendment by the Socialist Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 139· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and GIP. Against, most of GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 7 most voted in favour; in 38, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 7
Against: 38
Tie: 6

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	110	95 in favour · 15 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto	18	13 in favour · 1 against · 4 did not vote
GC-CiU	16	13 in favour · 3 did not vote
GIP	11	9 in favour · 2 did not vote
GUPyD	5	5 against
Popular en el Congreso	185	173 against · 12 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000110
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 139
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error