Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the Foreigner Detention Centers (CIE).

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 27 June 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: La Izquierda Plural.

Follow

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000097· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced27 June 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted1 July 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary5 July 2013All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2013Jul 2013Aug 201311. 27 June 2013: Presentación22. 1 July 2013: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 01/07/2013 hasta 05/07/201333. 1 July 2013: Calificación44. 5 July 2013: Pleno desde 05/07/2013 hasta 10/09/201355. 10 September 2013: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 10/09/2013 hasta 18/09/2014

10 September 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 16 yes · 171 no · 126 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation on Foreigner Detention Centers (CIE). Voted in the terms of the incorporation of the amendment submitted by the Mixed Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 7 of sitting 125· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto and GIP. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 8 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 40, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 40
  • Abstained: 9
  • Tie: 3
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
2 against · 100 abst. · 8 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 abst.
Mixto18
4 in favour · 2 against · 3 abst. · 9 did not vote
GC-CiU16
13 abst. · 3 did not vote
GIP11
11 in favour
GUPyD5
5 abst.
Popular en el Congreso185
1 in favour · 167 against · 17 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error