What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the Government's intentions regarding the legal reforms necessary to eliminate various cases of parliamentary immunity and other procedural privileges of politicians and public officials.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 13 June 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Unión Progreso y Democracia.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000092· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

Introduced13 June 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted18 June 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary18 June 2013All 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 4 official steps on a timeline

20 June 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 19 yes · 184 no · 98 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Union, Progress and Democracy Parliamentary Group, on the Government's intentions regarding the legal reforms necessary to eliminate various cases of judicial immunity and other procedural privileges of politicians and public officials. It is voted on in the terms of the transitory amendment submitted by the Parliamentary Group of IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: The Plural Left and the Union, Progress and Democracy Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 117· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), GC-CiU and Popular en el Congreso. 9 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 43, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 0
Against: 43
Abstained: 1
Tie: 8

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	110	1 in favour · 4 against · 96 abst. · 9 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 against
Mixto	18	6 in favour · 2 against · 2 abst. · 8 did not vote
GC-CiU	16	11 against · 5 did not vote
GIP	11	7 in favour · 4 did not vote
GUPyD	5	5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso	185	162 against · 23 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000092
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 117
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the Government's intentions regarding the legal reforms necessary to eliminate various cases of parliamentary immunity and other procedural privileges of politicians and public officials. Automatic translation · See the Spanish original