Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the legal measures necessary to prosecute political corruption, by defining as a crime the illegal financing of political parties, the crime of unjust enrichment of public officials, and strengthening legal instruments to hold public managers accountable.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

Type of initiative: . It was introduced on 28 February 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Unión Progreso y Democracia.

Follow

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000066· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced28 February 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted5 March 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEno dateIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 2 official steps on a timeline
Feb 201311. 28 February 2013: Presentación22. 5 March 2013: Calificación

14 March 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 14 yes · 279 no · 23 abst.

Voted on: ITEM 7

This law had 7 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 8 of sitting 91· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Popular en el Congreso. 8 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 50, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 50
  • Abstained: 1
  • Tie: 1
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
94 against · 4 abst. · 12 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Mixto18
2 in favour · 2 against · 6 abst. · 8 did not vote
GC-CiU16
13 abst. · 3 did not vote
GIP11
7 in favour · 4 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
178 against · 7 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error