Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the Government's intentions regarding the establishment at the national level of shared custody as the preferred model in separation or divorce proceedings.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a motion. It was introduced on 14 June 2012. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Unión Progreso y Democracia.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000025· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced14 June 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted19 June 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary19 June 2012All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE19 June 2012It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Jun 201211. 14 June 2012: Presentación22. 19 June 2012: Calificación33. 19 June 2012: Pleno desde 19/06/2012 hasta 19/06/201244. 19 June 2012: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 19/06/2012 hasta 28/06/2012

19 June 2012

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 207 yes · 111 no · 8 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation on the Government's intentions regarding the establishment of shared custody as the preferred model in separation or divorce proceedings at the national level. Voted on the terms of the compromise amendment submitted by the Popular, Catalan (CiU), Union, Progress and Democracy, Basque (EAJ-PNV), and Mixed Parliamentary Groups.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 6 of sitting 40· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), GC-CiU, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista and GIP. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 45 most voted in favour; in 1, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 45
  • Against: 1
  • Tie: 6
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
102 against · 8 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto17
6 in favour · 8 abst. · 3 did not vote
GC-CiU16
16 in favour
GIP11
9 against · 2 did not vote
GUPyD5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso185
176 in favour · 9 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.