Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the Government's approach within the framework of the new reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 8 March 2012. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000011· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced8 March 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted13 March 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary13 March 2012All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Mar 201211. 8 March 2012: Presentación22. 13 March 2012: Calificación33. 13 March 2012: Pleno desde 13/03/2012 hasta 15/03/201244. 15 March 2012: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 15/03/2012 hasta 22/03/2012

15 March 2012

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 19 yes · 279 no · 22 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation on the Government's approach within the framework of the new reform of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). On the terms of the submitted compromise amendment.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 7 of sitting 19· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto and GIP. Against, most of Socialista, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 1 most voted in favour; in 48, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 1
  • Against: 48
  • Tie: 3
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
103 against · 1 abst. · 6 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 abst.
Mixto18
9 in favour · 1 against · 1 abst. · 7 did not vote
GC-CiU16
15 abst. · 1 did not vote
GIP11
9 in favour · 2 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 against
Popular en el Congreso185
1 in favour · 170 against · 14 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.