Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the continuity of Special Employment Centers.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a motion. It was introduced on 23 February 2012. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Vasco (EAJ-PNV).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000006· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced23 February 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted28 February 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary2 March 2012All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE6 March 2012It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Feb 2012Mar 2012Mar 2012Mar 201211. 23 February 2012: Presentación22. 28 February 2012: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 28/02/2012 hasta 02/03/201233. 28 February 2012: Calificación44. 2 March 2012: Pleno desde 02/03/2012 hasta 06/03/201255. 6 March 2012: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 06/03/2012 hasta 14/03/2012

6 March 2012

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 334 yes · 0 no

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation on the continuity of Special Employment Centers. Voted in the terms of the compromise amendment submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, the Socialist Parliamentary Group, the Catalan Parliamentary Group (CiU) and the Basque Parliamentary Group (EAJ-PNV).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 14· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso.

By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 52
  • Against: 0
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
103 in favour · 7 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
17 in favour · 1 did not vote
GC-CiU16
16 in favour
GIP11
10 in favour · 1 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
178 in favour · 7 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.