Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion on the urgent implementation of the Guarantee+45 Program.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 26 March 2015. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/001218· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced26 March 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted7 April 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary10 April 2015All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2015Apr 2015Apr 2015Apr 2015Apr 201511. 26 March 2015: Presentación22. 7 April 2015: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 07/04/2015 hasta 10/04/201533. 7 April 2015: Calificación44. 10 April 2015: Pleno desde 10/04/2015 hasta 28/04/201555. 28 April 2015: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 28/04/2015 hasta 07/05/2015

28 April 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 119 yes · 165 no · 22 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, regarding the urgent implementation of the Garantía+45 Program. Voted in the terms resulting from the incorporation of the amendment by the IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: La Izquierda Plural Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 259· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto and GIP. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 9 most voted in favour; in 35, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 9
  • Against: 35
  • Abstained: 2
  • Tie: 6
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
96 in favour · 14 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
9 in favour · 2 abst. · 7 did not vote
GC-CiU16
14 abst. · 2 did not vote
GIP11
9 in favour · 2 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 abst.
Popular en el Congreso185
1 in favour · 165 against · 1 abst. · 18 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.