Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion on the Action Plan of the National Health System against hepatitis C.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 2 January 2015. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Follow

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/001126· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced2 January 2015Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted13 January 2015The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary16 January 2015All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Jan 2015Jan 2015Jan 2015Jan 2015Jan 2015Feb 201511. 2 January 2015: Presentación22. 13 January 2015: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 13/01/2015 hasta 16/01/201533. 13 January 2015: Calificación44. 16 January 2015: Pleno desde 16/01/2015 hasta 10/02/201555. 10 February 2015: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 10/02/2015 hasta 18/02/2015

10 February 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 147 yes · 179 no · 7 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, on the Action Plan of the National Health System against hepatitis C. To be voted on in the terms of the transactional amendment submitted by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, the Union, Progress and Democracy Parliamentary Group and the IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: The Plural Left Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 239· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 8 most voted in favour; in 36, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 8
  • Against: 36
  • Abstained: 1
  • Tie: 7
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
99 in favour · 1 abst. · 10 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 abst.
Mixto18
18 in favour
GC-CiU16
14 in favour · 2 did not vote
GIP11
11 in favour
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
179 against · 1 abst. · 5 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error