Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion regarding the European Union-Kingdom of Morocco Fisheries Agreement.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 6 September 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Follow

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000720· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced6 September 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted10 September 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary13 September 2013All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE8 October 2013It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Sept 2013Sept 2013Sept 2013Sept 2013Oct 201311. 6 September 2013: Presentación22. 10 September 2013: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 10/09/2013 hasta 13/09/201333. 10 September 2013: Calificación44. 13 September 2013: Pleno desde 13/09/2013 hasta 08/10/201355. 8 October 2013: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 08/10/2013 hasta 16/10/2013

8 October 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 281 yes · 30 no · 3 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion regarding the European Union-Kingdom of Morocco Fisheries Agreement. It is voted on in the terms of the compromise amendment submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress and the Socialist Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 7 of sitting 134· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, GC-CiU and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GIP and GUPyD. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 49 most voted in favour; in 1, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 49
  • Against: 1
  • Tie: 2
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
97 in favour · 13 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 against · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
2 in favour · 10 against · 3 abst. · 3 did not vote
GC-CiU16
11 in favour · 5 did not vote
GIP11
10 against · 1 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 against
Popular en el Congreso185
171 in favour · 1 against · 13 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error