What it is

Non-legislative motion on tax fraud and corruption.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 14 March 2013. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000586· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

Introduced14 March 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted19 March 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary22 March 2013All 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 5 official steps on a timeline

9 April 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 24 yes · 282 no · 21 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion on tax fraud and corruption. Voted on with the incorporation of the self-amendment submitted by the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Mr. Cuadra). Also voted on with the amendments submitted by the IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: The Plural Left Parliamentary Group, in the terms of the transactional amendment submitted by Mr. Garzón Espinosa and Mr. Cuadra Lasarte.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 95· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto and GIP. Against, most of Socialista, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 48, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 0
Against: 48
Abstained: 2
Tie: 2

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	110	106 against · 4 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 abst.
Mixto	18	13 in favour · 2 against · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote
GC-CiU	16	15 abst. · 1 did not vote
GIP	11	11 in favour
GUPyD	5	5 against
Popular en el Congreso	185	169 against · 16 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000586
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 95
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Non-legislative motion on tax fraud and corruption. Automatic translation · See the Spanish original