Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion regarding free lending systems for textbooks and other curricular materials.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 26 November 2012. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Unión Progreso y Democracia.

Follow

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000481· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced26 November 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted4 December 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary10 December 2012All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE24 September 2013It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2012Mar 2013Jun 201311. 26 November 2012: Presentación22. 4 December 2012: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 04/12/2012 hasta 10/12/201233. 4 December 2012: Calificación44. 10 December 2012: Pleno desde 10/12/2012 hasta 24/09/201355. 24 September 2013: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 24/09/2013 hasta 03/10/2013

24 September 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 177 yes · 126 no · 4 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion regarding free lending systems for textbooks and other curricular materials. It is voted on in the terms of the compromise amendment submitted by the Mixed, United Progress and Democracy and Popular in the Congress Parliamentary Groups.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 131· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto and GC-CiU. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 37 most voted in favour; in 8, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 37
  • Against: 8
  • Tie: 7
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
101 against · 1 abst. · 8 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 against · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
2 in favour · 5 against · 3 abst. · 8 did not vote
GC-CiU16
16 against
GIP11
11 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
170 in favour · 15 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error