What it is

Non-legislative motion on the promotion of a public park of social rental housing through the real estate vehicles of financial entities.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 12 June 2012. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: La Izquierda Plural.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000340· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

Introduced12 June 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted19 June 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary22 June 2012All 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 5 official steps on a timeline

18 September 2012

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 153 yes · 169 no

Voted on: Non-legislative motion on the promotion of a public park of social rental housing through the real estate vehicles of financial entities. Voted in the terms resulting from the transactional amendment submitted by the Socialist Parliamentary Group and the Parliamentary Group of IU, ICV-EUiA, CHA: The Plural Left.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 54· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 10 most voted in favour; in 36, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 10
Against: 36
Tie: 6

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	110	105 in favour · 5 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 in favour
Mixto	18	13 in favour · 2 against · 3 did not vote
GC-CiU	16	14 in favour · 2 did not vote
GIP	11	11 in favour
GUPyD	5	5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso	185	167 against · 18 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000340
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 54
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Non-legislative motion on the promotion of a public park of social rental housing through the real estate vehicles of financial entities. Automatic translation · See the Spanish original