Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion on the review of the stability and growth program calendar.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 25 January 2012. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000135· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced25 January 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted26 January 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary31 January 2012All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Jan 2012Feb 2012Feb 2012Feb 201211. 25 January 2012: Presentación22. 26 January 2012: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 26/01/2012 hasta 31/01/201233. 26 January 2012: Calificación44. 31 January 2012: Pleno desde 31/01/2012 hasta 07/02/201255. 7 February 2012: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 07/02/2012 hasta 14/02/2012

7 February 2012

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 125 yes · 184 no · 18 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion on the review of the stability and growth program calendar.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 5· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto and GUPyD. Against, most of GIP and Popular en el Congreso. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 5 most voted in favour; in 37, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 5
  • Against: 37
  • Abstained: 2
  • Tie: 8
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
108 in favour · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
7 in favour · 1 against · 2 abst. · 8 did not vote
GC-CiU16
16 abst.
GIP11
11 against
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
1 in favour · 172 against · 12 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.