Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion on the review of the statute of former Presidents of the Government and the promotion of the necessary legislative initiatives to guarantee transparency in their remuneration regime and to regulate their regime of incompatibilities between the receipt of remuneration from public and private funds.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 22 December 2011. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario de Unión Progreso y Democracia.

Follow

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000052· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced22 December 2011Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted28 December 2011The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary3 January 2012All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2011Jan 201211. 22 December 2011: Presentación22. 28 December 2011: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 28/12/2011 hasta 03/01/201233. 28 December 2011: Calificación44. 3 January 2012: Pleno desde 03/01/2012 hasta 14/02/201255. 14 February 2012: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 14/02/2012 hasta 21/02/2012

14 February 2012

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 26 yes · 291 no · 3 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion on the review of the statute of former Presidents of the Government and the promotion of the necessary legislative initiatives to guarantee transparency in their remuneration regime and to regulate their regime of incompatibilities between the receipt of remuneration from public and private funds.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 8· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Socialista, GC-CiU and Popular en el Congreso. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 50, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 50
  • Tie: 2
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
99 against · 1 abst. · 10 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
6 in favour · 1 against · 1 abst. · 10 did not vote
GC-CiU16
16 against
GIP11
11 in favour
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
175 against · 1 abst. · 9 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error