Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Subcommittee for the analysis of the structural problems of the health system and the main reforms that must be undertaken to guarantee its sustainability.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a subcommittee or working group. It was introduced on 14 June 2012. Introduced by: Pleno del Congreso.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 154/000003· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced14 June 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted14 June 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committee14 June 2012A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE28 May 2014It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2012Dec 201311. 14 June 2012: Presentación22. 14 June 2012: Calificación33. 14 June 2012: Comisión de Sanidad y Servicios Sociales Informe desde 14/06/2012 hasta 27/11/201344. 27 November 2013: Comisión de Sanidad y Servicios Sociales Aprobación Informe desde 27/11/2013 hasta 28/05/201455. 28 May 2014: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 28/05/2014 hasta 12/06/2014

21 March 2013

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 208 yes · 106 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Subcommittee for the analysis of the structural problems of the health system and the main reforms that must be undertaken to guarantee its sustainability.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 18 of sitting 94· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista and GIP. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 46 most voted in favour; in 2, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 46
  • Against: 2
  • Tie: 4
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
3 in favour · 96 against · 11 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
4 in favour · 2 abst. · 12 did not vote
GC-CiU16
14 in favour · 2 did not vote
GIP11
1 in favour · 10 against
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
177 in favour · 8 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.