What it is
Cuts to electric power premiums and rules for SAREB insurance investments
It is a royal decree-law. It was introduced on 6 February 2013. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Royal Decree-Law 2/2013, of 1 February, on urgent measures in the electricity system and the financial sector.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 130/000032· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- As of January 1, 2013, updates to payments, tariffs and premiums in the electric system no longer use the CPI. They use instead a price index at constant taxes excluding unprocessed foods and energy products.
- Royal Decree 661/2007 on special regime generation is amended: the reference premium for all subgroups becomes 0 c€/kWh, the upper and lower limits are removed, and tariffs for several installations, such as offshore wind, are adjusted.
- Special regime installations that choose to sell their energy on the market can no longer switch later to the regulated tariff option.
- Solar thermal installations that won a competitive tender for innovative technology will receive the payment set in the tender resolution, calculated from the values in Order IET/3586/2011 reduced by the stated percentage.
- Securities issued by SAREB count as eligible assets to cover insurance companies' technical provisions, capped at 3%. They are valued at cost, and unrealized gains or losses do not count toward the solvency margin.
- Special regime installations already selling on the market automatically switch to the regulated tariff option as of January 1, 2013, unless they tell the Dirección General de Política Energética y Minas before February 15, 2013 that they want to stay on the market option.
Who it affects
- Electricity consumers: Avoids a new increase in access tolls.
- Special regime power producers: Their reference premiums drop to 0, and market sellers cannot return to the regulated tariff.
- Solar thermal tender winners: They receive the payment set in their tender resolution.
- Insurance companies: They can use SAREB securities to cover technical provisions, capped at 3%.
Words worth knowing
- Régimen especial (special regime)
- A category of electricity generation, mostly renewable and waste-based, with regulated tariffs or premiums.
- Prima (premium)
- Extra payment given to some electric installations on top of the market price.
- Peajes de acceso (access tolls)
- Charges paid by electricity consumers that fund the costs of the electric system.
- Provisiones técnicas (technical provisions)
- Money insurers must set aside to pay future claims.
- Margen de solvencia (solvency margin)
- Financial cushion insurers must hold to absorb unexpected losses.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced6 February 2013Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted12 February 2013The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
- Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary12 February 2013All 350 deputies vote.
- Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEno dateIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
14 February 2013
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Processing as a Government bill by the urgent procedure of Royal Decree-Law 2/2013, of 1 February, on urgent measures in the electricity system and the financial sector.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 6 of sitting 84· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 3 yes · 7 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 21 yes · 7 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta No count 0 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Granada Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 17 yes · 16 no
- Málaga More votes against 3 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 8 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 9 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso.
By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 34, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 11
- Against: 34
- Tie: 6
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 104 in favour · 6 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 18 | 14 in favour · 4 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 13 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 11 in favour |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 176 against · 9 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
Published in the BOE: Royal Decree-Law 2/2013, of February 1, on urgent measures in the electricity system and the financial sector.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 130/000032
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 6 of sitting 84
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2013-1117
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.