Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to ease mortgage debt and give debtors a second chance

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 31 July 2012. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma de Cataluña - Parlamento.

Official title: Private member's bill on measures against personal and family over-indebtedness and protection against mortgage enforcement proceedings on the habitual residence.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000011· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would limit new mortgages on a primary home: a maximum term of 30 years and an amount of no more than 90% of the appraised value (100% for publicly protected housing). It would also require informing consumers about the risks and cap late-payment interest.
  2. If the debtor believes the mortgage contract contains abusive clauses, they could oppose the foreclosure and, if they file a lawsuit within 20 days, the judge could suspend the foreclosure until that case is decided.
  3. It creates an out-of-court process to settle the debts of people at risk of losing their primary home. A regional over-indebtedness commission handles a payment plan, which may include handing over the home in payment, and opening the process suspends the foreclosure and late-payment interest.
  4. It amends the Insolvency Law to create a simplified insolvency process for individuals with debts from their primary home. If the requirements are met, the judge can discharge the remaining debts after a monitoring period of up to five years: the so-called second chance.
  5. At auctions of a primary home, minimum bids would have to reach at least 80% of the appraised value, and the creditor could only be awarded the home at that percentage or at the total debt if it is higher.
  6. The Government would have to introduce bills so that handing over the home in payment is not taxed as a capital gain under personal income tax The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings., and to grant a 99% rebate on the tax on the increase in urban land value in these cases.

Who it affects

  • Individuals and families with mortgage debts on their primary home who risk losing it: They could use the out-of-court debt settlement process and, if they meet the requirements, have remaining debts discharged.
  • People taking out a mortgage on a primary home in the future: Limits on loan term and amount would apply, and they must be informed of the risks.
  • Financial institutions: They would face restrictions on granting mortgages, and foreclosures could be suspended if there are abusive clauses.
  • Autonomous communities (regional governments): They must create and regulate the over-indebtedness commissions in their territory.
  • People who have already lost their home through foreclosure: Authorities must give priority to housing measures for them.

Words worth knowing

Dación en pago
Handing the home over to the bank to settle the mortgage debt.
Ejecución hipotecaria
Foreclosure: the court process by which the home is auctioned or awarded to the creditor when the mortgage is not paid.
Exoneración del pasivo pendiente
A judge releasing the debtor from the debts they could not pay.
Concurso (concursal)
Insolvency proceeding: a court process to manage the debts of a person or company that cannot pay them.
Cláusula abusiva
A contract term that unfairly harms one party, usually the consumer.
income tax
The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced31 July 2012Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted4 September 2012The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2012Dec 201311. 31 July 2012: Presentación22. 4 September 2012: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 04/09/2012 hasta 07/09/201233. 4 September 2012: Calificación44. 7 September 2012: Gobierno Contestación desde 07/09/2012 hasta 15/10/201255. 15 October 2012: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 15/10/2012 hasta 11/02/201466. 11 February 2014: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 11/02/2014 hasta 14/02/2014

11 February 2014

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 160 yes · 180 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Private Member's Bill by the Parliament of Catalonia, on measures against personal and family over-indebtedness and protection against mortgage enforcement proceedings of the habitual residence.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 162· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 9 most voted in favour; in 35, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 9
  • Against: 35
  • Tie: 8
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
108 in favour · 1 against · 1 abst.
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto18
16 in favour · 2 did not vote
GC-CiU16
16 in favour
GIP11
11 in favour
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
179 against · 6 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.